May 23, 2013

Top Ten People of 2011 by Inside the Vatican magazine

Again this year, as each year for the past decade, we are happy to present to you Inside the Vatican’s “Top Ten” people for the year just past. Our “Top Ten People of 2011” includes cardinals and laypeople, diplomats and monks, scholars and activists. All are marked by a common characteristic: humility. None wished to be named to this list. And that is precisely one of the key reasons we felt compelled to include each one of them.

Our list, of course, cannot contain the names of hundreds and thousands of other worthy men and women. We have missed many people of courage and faith. But we feel the people we have chosen all fittingly represent that courage, that nobility of spirit, that gentleness of heart, which bears witness to the presence of faith, of the Holy Spirit, in our midst.

But for now, we would like to recall the last man named on our list, Archbishop Pietro Sambi, whom we knew. He died on July 27, 2011, unexpectedly, at age 73. He was expected to return to Rome and be named a cardinal.

I once asked Sambi what he thought were the greatest problems facing “our Church.” He replied: “You are wrong from the very beginning, from the way you pose your question. It is not ‘our Church.’ It is His Church — Christ’s Church. He will care for His Church. Trust in Him.”
—The Editor

1. Father Cassian Folsom 
Refounder of the Benedictine monastery in Norcia, Italy, birthplace of St. Benedict
2. Mother Miriam
Convert from Judaism, now foundress of a Benedictine community of nuns
3. Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-Kiung
The courageous defender of the faith and of religious freedom in China
4. Birgit Wansing
The consecrated laywoman without whom the Pope might not have written his books
5. Sister Patricia Murray
The Irish nun who has helped thousands in war-torn Sudan
6. Marino Restrepo 
His entire life changed after he was kidnapped for six months…
7. Dr. Ornella Parolini
One of the world’s leading authorities in biotechnology and stem cell therapy
8. Mercedes Wilson
A fighter for the pro-life cause who begins at the root: the innocence of children
9. Cardinal Kurt Koch
A quiet Swiss theologian who is now the leading ecumenist in the world
10. Archbishop Pietro Sambi
One of the most important diplomats in the Church, he was a simple man of faith…

#1. Father Cassian Folsom, O.S.B.

Sometimes we are able to see a splendid adventure of life and faith just at the moment that it is unfolding. And we are able to watch the struggles and challenges and successes of a man, or of a group of men, and even to participate with them in that adventure.

Such is the case with Father Cassian Folsom and the refounding of the Benedictine monastery in Norcia, Italy—the birthplace of St. Benedict in about A.D. 480—which was closed in 1810, and reopened after 190 years in the year 2000.

For what Father Folsom has done for Norcia, for what he has done for monasticism in general and Benedictine monasticism in particular, for what he has done for the Church’s liturgy (for the last three years, the monastery in Norcia has been offering Holy Mass in both uses of the Roman Rite, old and new) and for what he has taught all of us about following Christ by his Christian example, we feel privileged to have the opportunity to select Cassian Folsom, who is also an old friend, as our “Person of the Year” for 2011.

Cassian’s initiative is one of the “points of light” in the Church and world today.

Born in 1955 in Lynn, Massachusetts (USA), Folsom grew up in Connecticut until his path took him into religious life. He served as the vice-rector of the Pontifical Athenaeum of Saint Anselm from 1997 to 2000 and is the founding prior of the Benedictine monastery Maria Sedes Sapientiae (“Mary Seat of Wisdom”) in Norcia, Italy, where he is also the rector of the Basilica of San Benedetto.

A member of the US Fellowship of Catholic Scholars, he is the author of numerous studies on Roman Catholic liturgy. In his monastery newsletter there is an interview with Folsom which we felt worth sharing here.

Does your decision to celebrate Mass also in the old rite respect the Second Vatican Council?

Father Cassian Folsom: It would be useful to read carefully the Council document on the Liturgy. Sacrosanctum Concilium 22 says: “Regulation of the sacred liturgy depends solely on the authority of the Church, that is, on the Apostolic See and, as laws may determine, on the bishop.” Pope Benedict’s 2007 motu proprio simply reiterates that principle, and legislates for the use of the old rite alongside the new. Pope Benedict also emphasizes that the way to interpret the Council documents is by the hermeneutic of continuity. That principle is also expressed in the document on the liturgy where it says: “…care must be taken that any new forms adopted should in some way grow organically from forms already existing” (SC 23). What we’re really talking about here is legitimate pluralism, which the Council advocates as well: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not involve the faith or the good of the whole community” (SC 37).

So the celebration of the Mass by all means respects the Second Vatican Council. We are embracing both usages and reaching out to other groups in search of unity.

That’s a very conciliar approach. But doesn’t this mean “turning back the clock”?

Folsom: On the contrary, I see a monastery “utriusque usus” (using both forms of the Roman rite) as very forward-looking, especially in terms of authentic ecumenism. By that I mean two things.

First, the ethos of the extraordinary form is very similar to the ethos of the many oriental rites, and therefore celebrating the Eucharist according to both forms allows us to serve as a bridge between East and West. Second, I think we need a good dose of “internal ecumenism” in the Church, so as to be able to dialogue with Catholics attached to the older liturgical forms without ideological prejudice. It is “politically correct” for Latin-rite Catholics to be enthusiastic about the Byzantine rite. Why isn’t it “politically correct” to be enthusiastic about the extraordinary form as well?

The history of the liturgy shows clearly a multiplicity of usages within the one Roman rite. It is thanks to many years of studying the liturgy that I came to see the importance of this unity in diversity. In fact, I argued this point in the presence of the then-Cardinal Ratzinger at a liturgical conference held at Fontgombault in France in 1997. As a liturgist, I would also like to say that there is no perfect rite; there are positive and negative aspects in every liturgical tradition. The only perfect liturgy is the heavenly one.

How can the two usages influence each other?

Folsom: At the risk of oversimplifying, I would say that the ordinary form stresses rational understanding, speaking in prose, as it were. The extraordinary form provides rich food for the intellect also, but relies heavily on gesture, symbolism, intuition, silence, ritual action without words, speaking in poetry, you might say. Man knows both rationally and intuitively. He needs both prose and poetry. If the two usages, like two different cultures, can patiently live with each other over time, they can become friends.  —Robert Moynihan

#2. Mother Miriam

Mother Miriam of the Lamb of God is one of the most eloquent, passionate, filled-with-the-fire-of-faith women it has been our privilege to come to know.

Born Rosalind Moss into a Conservative Jewish family in Brooklyn, New York, after a long spiritual journey, she became just four months ago, on September 8, a Benedictine nun and the foundress of her own order within the Benedictine family, Daughters of Mary, Mother of Israel’s Hope, based in Tulsa, Oklahoma (USA).

For her example as a seeker of truth, for her honesty as a person willing to suffer for the truth she has found, for her joyfulness in living out her vocation, we are privileged to be able to choose her among our “Top Ten” people of 2011.

In the text of Bishop Edward Slattery’s decree establishing the new religious community, Slattery wrote: “In every age and place, the Holy Spirit, Lord and Giver of Life, is at work in the Body of Christ to regenerate and extend the various forms of consecrated life by which the Church is enriched and made present in the world…. Moreover, from Apostolic times, unmarried women and widows have sought to imitate the Daughter of Sion, the Blessed Virgin Mary, in her unconditional surrender to the will of the Father and the overshadowing of the Holy Spirit. Having said her ‘Yes’ in response to the message of the Archangel Gabriel, the Virgin of Nazareth became blessed above all women, the Joy of Israel, and the Glory of Jerusalem.”

Slattery continued: “Among the wo­men who seek to imitate the Blessed Virgin Mary and aspire to share in her spiritual motherhood today, are the Daughters of Mary, Mother of Israel’s Hope. The mystery of the Presentation of Jesus in the Temple is the luminous pattern of their ecclesial mission to all peoples: Jew and Gentile, young and old, rich and poor. Contemplating that mystery, they rejoice that the Light of the World has come, and receive the Child Jesus, Israel’s Hope and Consolation, from the arms of His Blessed Mother as did Simeon; their mission is to teach others to do likewise, and so find hope in this valley of tears.

“They listen to Simeon’s prophetic utterance and recognize in his arms the Promised One, who from the altar of the Cross will offer Himself to the Father as the Atoning Lamb. Thus are they compelled to undertake works of catechesis so that all peoples may find in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass the wellspring of salvation, life, and resurrection….

“New foundations of consecrated life are fragile undertakings; they must welcome the wisdom of past generations with humility and gratitude, learning from the teaching and example of the saints who never grow old. It is by a sure and praiseworthy instinct, then, that the Daughters of Mary, Mother of Israel’s Hope, have chosen to graft their tender shoot onto the age-old tree of the Benedictine tradition…

“For this reason, it pleases me to confirm and approve the Rule of St. Benedict as the fundamental pattern of the life of the Daughters of Mary, Mother of Israel’s Hope. Their life will be further governed by the Constitutions here appended, which I hereby approve and promulgate…

“In accord with the aforementioned Constitutions, I appoint Rosalind Moss, in religion, Mother Miriam of the Lamb of God, prioress of the Community, and authorize the opening of their residence in the Diocese of Tulsa as the Priory of Our Lady of Guadalupe.

“Given in Tulsa, in the Year of Our Lord 2011, on this 8th day of September, the Feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary.”

In an interview with Trent Beattie of the National Catholic Register published on December 8, entitled “Rosalind Moss’ Unexpected Journey,” Mother Miriam explained her feelings on the day of her entrance into religious life in these words: “If there were a more glorious day in my life, I can’t think of when it was. I have always felt that I was made for another world and that I was a pilgrim in this one. Giving my life to God through Christ from my Jewish background changed my life forever. Coming further into the fullness of Christianity 18 years later in the Catholic Church deepened my relationship with God more than I knew was possible. Still, even after these life-changing events, there remained a longing in my heart for something yet beyond this world. On September 8, in the small Monastery of the Cenacle of Our Lady in Tulsa, heaven seemed to flood my heart as Bishop Slattery received my vows and as, through that beautiful and holy shepherd of Tulsa, I gave myself to the Bridegroom of my soul.

“Bishop Slattery led the ceremony, with the assistance of Father Mark Daniel Kirby, O.S.B. About 15 people were in attendance, including priests, religious brothers and sisters. The Nativity of Our Lord was brought to mind, which, like our setting in the small oratory, was a private event, with even less than 15 people in attendance. Yet the seemingly humble, private and hidden birth of our Lord resulted in the world’s savation. Our prayer is that that same Lord in the manger would be pleased to grow the seed of our humble, private beginning into a means of salvation and hope for many souls.” —Robert Moynihan

#3. Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-kiun

For the past decade, Joseph Zen Ze-kiun, the sixth Chinese cardinal in the history of the Church, has been a fearless defender of the Church in Hong Kong and mainland China. As the People’s Republic of China has emerged as one of the world’s main economic and political powers, many leaders in the East and the West have chosen the path of appeasement with Beijing for economic, political or other advantage, and avoided raising the question of fundamental human rights and freedoms, including the freedom of the Church. Cardinal Zen is not one of them. Ever since becoming bishop of Hong Kong in 2002, he has not hesitated to challenge the Chinese authorities whenever he perceived they were failing to respect democratic and civil freedoms in Hong Kong, or religious freedom in China.

Because of this noble courage in the face of power, we honor him as one of our “Top Ten” people of 2011.

Born into a Catholic family in Shanghai on January 13, 1932, Zen is turning 80 in this month of January 2012. He joined the Salesian Order in 1944, and moved from Shanghai to Hong Kong in 1948 before the Communists came to power. He was sent to study in Italy, and was ordained a priest in Turin in 1961. He went on to do higher studies at the Salesian University in Rome, where he obtained his doctorate in philosophy in 1964.

After returning to Hong Kong, he taught philosophy at the Salesian House of Studies, and both theology and philosophy at Holy Spirit Seminary.

Today, as he turns 80, he still teaches philosophy at the seminary.

Ever attentive to the political developments and the situation of the Catholic Church in the land of his birth, from 1978-83 he served as head of the China Province of the Salesian Order. From 1989 to 1996, Zen spent six months of every year teaching in mainland seminaries and got to know many mainland bishops, priests and seminarians. He gained an important insight into, and understanding of, the religious and political situation in China.

This work came to an end in 1996 when John Paul II named him coadjutor bishop of Hong Kong and, in September 2002, named him head of the diocese following the death of Cardinal John Baptist Wu. For his defense of democratic freedoms and human rights, in 2002, Apple Daily, Hong Kong’s pro-democracy newspaper, named him “Man of the Year.”

Indeed, ever since becoming bishop, he has taken a stance for such rights. He fought for the right of abode in the former British colony of children of Hong Kong residents born on the mainland.

In 2003, he was one of the leading opponents of a proposed anti-subversion law that would have endangered democratic freedoms. When 500,000 people marched against the proposed legislation, the government withdrew it.

In 2004, he again came out in support of democratic freedoms the government was seeking to restrict, and from 2005 to 2011 he led the Church’s battle in the courts to ensure that Catholics could continue to manage their own schools. When the Church lost that battle last October, Zen, then 79, went on a 3-day hunger strike to protest the Court of Final Appeal’s decision.

Ever concerned about the difficult situation of the Catholic Church on the mainland where, he once remarked, “our bishops are slaves,” the fearless Zen became the most vocal and charismatic advocate for religious freedom for the Catholics of mainland China.

Pope Benedict strongly supported him and made Zen a cardinal in February 2006.

Zen rejoiced when the Pope later created a special commission to monitor and advise him on the situation of the Church in China, and published his landmark Letter to Catholics on the mainland.

Since then, Zen has made a major contribution to the work of that commission. He has also strongly defended the “clandestine” (underground) Cath­olic community in China, which refuses to be controlled by the government.

He has spoken out forcefully against the ordination of bishops on the mainland without the Pope’s approval, and has urged China’s bishops to give heroic witness to their faith and to their communion with the Pope. He has called on Beijing to release two elderly bishops and many (over 30) priests it has detained, and demanded that it tell the Chinese people the truth about what happened in Tiananmen Square.

More than any other Catholic Church leader, he has drawn the world’s attention to these and other serious violations of religious liberty and human rights in China.

Attacked by Beijing and its controlled media for his insistence on religious liberty and democratic rights, and criticized by some in the Church for his confrontational attitude toward Beijing, this inspiring and courageous cardinal refuses to remain silent and insists that it is only by granting its citizens freedom — both religious and civil — that China can become truly great and be a force for good in the world. —Gerard O’Connell

#4. Birgit Wahnsing

Though few in the general public have heard of her, those few believe that many of the books by Joseph Ratzinger, both before he became Pope and since, would not have been written without her help.

She is one of the Pope’s closest and most trusted collaborators and advisors, and for the quiet, cheerful, steady assistance that she has given to him, and through him, to the Church, for more than a quarter century, we honor her as one of our “People of the Year” for 2011.

Birgit Wansing is a consecrated woman (a laywoman who has consecrated her life to God, but not a nun). She belongs to the Schoenstatt Movement, which was started in 1914 in a small Marian sanctuary in the Rhine Valley in Germany, and is today found in 80 countries throughout the world. Her interests are very wide-ranging. (Some years ago, she wrote an essay for L’Osservatore Romano condemning animal cruelty as incompatible with Christianity.)

Discreet, thoroughly German, she appears to be just one more among the many people working in the Vatican. She lives very simply (she can often be seen pedaling her bike through the streets in and near the Vatican, and her face lights up with a sunny smile if one greets her). This simplicity means she is rarely “noticed.” (More well-known is the bustling Ingrid Stampa, since 1991 Benedict’s other close lay confidant and advisor, first at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and then as personal assistant to the Pope. Ingrid, an academic, is, like Birgit, a lay affiliate of the Schoenstatt Sisters of Mary, and has now been integrated into the German section of the secretariat of state, where she takes care of the Italian translations of many of the Pope’s writings.)

Birgit is not a theologian but a musician, translator and protector of the Pope’s health. For nearly 25 years, she has had one very special job: she has transferred onto a computer the handwritten rough drafts of Joseph Ratzinger’s writings.

Since he was a professor, Benedict XVI likes to write by hand, in pencil. He does not even use a typewriter. His texts are often the transcripts of lectures and conferences that he revises before publication.

This is where Birgit enters the creative process. She deciphers the tiny handwriting and makes it readable to editors and translators. Her work is a quiet and discreet job that began when Joseph Ratzinger was prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Another area that Birgit takes care of with patience is upgrading the vast bibliography of Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI.

Many of the students of the Ratzinger Schülerkreis turn to her for specific research, and her name appears in the acknowledgments of many doctoral theses alongside that of the Pope’s secretary, Monsignor Georg Gänswein.

Every morning the Pope’s day begins with a meeting with Birgit before the usual work with the secretariat, especially in these recent months, which Benedict XVI has spent working on the final draft of his third book on Jesus dedicated to the childhood Gospels. Before passing the text to Ingrid Stampa, who now works in the Secretariat of State, and to translators for other languages, Birgit prepares the text and the bibliography that the Pope approves. For the first two books, there were 1,000 pages to write and rewrite.

Birgit is therefore part of the Pope’s inner circle and seems to have an excellent relationship with the four Memores Domini who run the papal household, and with Sister Christine Felder, who accompanies the brother of the Pope when he is in Rome. For this reason it was quite normal to see her with Carmela, Lore­dana and Christina last year when Manuela, one of the Memores, died tragically in a car accident. Birgit was in the front row when the Pope came to pay his last respects to Manuela in the Church of St. Stephen of the Abyssinians in the Vatican. Now the Memores are four again after the arrival of Rossella and the “family” is again complete. (Ingrid instead seems to participate less in the daily life of the “apartment.”)

Birgit and Ingrid supervised, with Fr. Georg, the transfer of Ratzinger’s library from his apartment in the Piazza della Città Leonina to the Apostolic Palace. Neither lives in the apartment next door to the Pope, where the Memores reside, or upstairs where the Pope’s personal secretaries live, but both live in the Vatican and are formally part of the Secretariat of State.

In 2005, when the newly-elected Pope went to visit his old colleagues at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Birgit Wansing was still among them. Then-Archbishop Angelo Amato, despite his joy at the election of his boss, with whom he would no longer work, said: “Besides him, we have also lost a valuable employee in Monsignor Gänswein, and, I’m afraid—so to speak—that even our talented colleague Birgit Wansing, who for many years worked in the office of Cardinal Ratzinger, is about to change palaces…” —Angela Ambrogetti

#5. Sr. Patricia Murray

Last year, long years of struggle for independence finally led to the creation of a new independent state in Africa — South Sudan. It is one of the poorest countries in the world.

Into that situation of mixed hope and suffering has stepped an Irish woman, Sister Patricia Murray of the Institute of the Blessed Virgin Mary, sometimes known as the Loreto Sisters. (The order’s foundress, Mary Ward [1585-1645], an English Catholic, was declared “Venerable” by Pope Benedict XVI on December 19, 2009.)

Through the “Solidarity With South Sudan” project, established by religious from 170 Catholic religious congregations and led by Sr. Murray, thousands in South Sudan have been able to live with dignity despite their country’s poverty. She has helped “the poorest of the poor” with great energy, great courage, great administrative skill, and great love.

For these reasons, we are happy to include Sister Patricia Murray, whom we have come to know personally, among our “Top Ten” people of 2011.

In a 2010 lecture entitled “To Seek God in Our Suffering World,” Sr. Murray explained the origins of this effort.

“The initiative known as Solidarity With Southern Sudan began to take shape from December 2005 onwards,” she said. “While this initiative is obviously a response to the very real and immediate needs of Southern Sudan, perhaps it is also pointing the way towards a new missionary paradigm, a new way of collaborating within religious life.

“In March 2006, a six-person international delegation of the Union of Superiors General (an umbrella group for Catholic religious orders) visited six dioceses in Southern Sudan and the Nuba Mountains, invited to ‘come and see the situation on the ground in Southern Sudan’ by Bishop Joseph Gasi of the Tombura-Yambio diocese.

“The invitation came soon after the conclusion of the International Congress on Consecrated Life held in Rome in November 2004 with the theme: ‘Passion for Christ, Passion for Humanity.’ Here the Instrumentum Laboris focused on themes like discernment, refounding and creative action to explore where ‘the Spirit is creating newness in religious life — especially those opportunities for creative fidelity.’ The working paper suggested that a new paradigm for consecrated life is being put together, born of compassion for the scarred and downtrodden of the earth.

“The documents of the Congress speak about the need to return to a life of poverty, solidarity and compassion, which have always been key elements in the refounding process of religious life.

“The Congress’ call for a new imagination in religious life, is captured in the double Gospel icon of the Samaritan woman and the Samaritan man; one is an icon of willingness to change plans and give freely, and the other icon shows a willingness to reveal our deepest longings to others and to actively seek out the new wells to which we have been summoned. The two Samaritan stories show that it is in our frailty that space is opened up for God to do something new.

“These Samaritan stories remind us ‘not to avoid dangerous roads because new things always emerge off the beaten path, away from the safe, protected everyday places.’ They urge us to risk sharing our vulnerability, our fragility, our darkness, our weariness and thirst, making a deeper exchange and reciprocity possible and opening us up to the possibility of being evangelized by the very people to whom we announce the Gospel. For it is in responding to their needs that new ways for religious life will be uncovered.

“Therefore the invitation to send a delegation to Sudan was seen as an opportunity to respond to the Congress’ invitation ‘to find out how to move outside the walls that shelter us and placing ourselves at a crossroads within reach of the marginalized who have been made invisible, unrecognized and voiceless… and recognizing these as privileged places for entering into communion with the Compassionate One.’

“When the people heard of our desire to be in solidarity with them as members of the universal Catholic Church they said repeatedly, ‘Thank you for coming to be with us.’” Sister Murray concluded her address with a prayer composed by the founder of her religious congregation, Mary Ward:

Make this heart complete as you would have it be.

Our hearts are ready, O God, our hearts are ready!

Put us where you want us to be, We are in your hand.

Turn us this way or that, as you desire,

We are yours, ready for everything.

—Anna Artymiak

#6. Marino Restrepo

Marino Restrepo’s life took a drastic turn at midnight on Christmas Eve in 1997.

Driving to the ranch of one of his uncles in Colombia, where he was to spend the night, he was kidnapped by the Colombian rebels of the FARC (Revolutionary Arm Forces of Colombia) and taken to the jungle. He was held hostage for six months.

When he was released, he was a changed man.

And over time, the change turned him into a remarkable witness for the faith, so much so that we decided we needed to recognize him among our “Top Ten” people of 2011.

Marino Restrepo was born in the Andes Mountains of Colombia in a small coffee-growers’ town. His family was one of strong Catholic faith, following all of the traditional Catholic traditions and teachings. He was the sixth child in a family of 10.

At age 14 he moved to the capital of Colombia, Bogotá, for his high school education. He married shortly before he turned 20, and moved to Hamburg, Germany, where he attended the University of Hamburg and studied arts. His two sons were born there, and after spending six years in Germany, he moved to Los Angeles, California. He has lived in Los Angeles ever since, working in the entertainment industry as an actor and musical composer — not a place normally conducive to great sanctity.

In 1985, he was signed to Sony music of New York as an exclusive artist with his band Santa Fe. The band released a number of albums worldwide and toured throughout the world following the release of their records.

Marino lived in this world of entertainment for 20 years, and he spent all those years away from his childhood faith.

He had started to drift away from Catholicism already when he moved to Bogotá in the 1960s. He himself says that he became “a pagan,” and his life took a sharp turn towards the life of a worldly human being, focused on shallow materialistic matters such as money, fame, and pleasure. He involved himself in Eastern pagan religions and all kinds of esoteric sciences, such as astrology, crystals, candles, aromatherapy, flora therapy, card reading, I-ching, runes, psychics and all kinds of superstitions.

Then came Christmas of 1997. During the first 15 days of his kidnapping, he was kept in a cave with bats and different kinds of bugs while the captors were waiting for the rebels to pick him up.

In that very cave, and after finding out that he was sentenced to death by his captors, he went through a mystical experience with God that changed his life forever.

Five and a half months later, Marino was miraculously released from captivity, and after his release he returned to his Catholic faith. He went to confession to a Franciscan priest who shortly afterward became his spiritual father: Fray Jose Maria de las Cinco Llagas, an Italian, and founder in Colombia of the Franciscan Friars of the Renewal order.

Marino then spent 14 months in California, learning how to be a Catholic again.

One day during the celebration of a Palm Sunday Mass, he had another mystical experience. He was shown by Jesus on the crucifix a vision of the mission that lay ahead of him. He was to accept it or reject it. Jesus was not obliging him to follow his direction.

Soon after that Holy Week, he began a missionary experience where his conversion testimony became the center of a full-time mission. That started in 1999 and has been ongoing throughout the world ever since.

Marino became a full-time missionary for the Catholic Church, leaving his entire past, and his worldly possessions, behind. By observing the needs of many poor priests in the very heart of true poverty in Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela and Panama, Marino was inspired to seek in countries with more privileged economies the right help for the right needs. He says he has seen Holy Mass being celebrated with a plastic chalice and priests wearing liturgical garments that were improvised by good and very poor Samaritans.

So he be­gan to ask for donations of altar vessels that were not being used any longer, as well as liturgical garments that were old and out of circulation in the wealthy parishes of North America and Europe. This turned out to be a great ministry that has provided the necessary items for many parishes in poor countries. There are still hundreds of churches in great need.

Marino also founded a lay mission called The Pilgrims of Love. Through this group, he works to provide poor Catholics not only with the word of the Gospel, but also with food, medicine, education and clothing. He has been able to build churches and chapels in many of those communities, as well as schools and first aid centers. He is a very strict follower of the Church’s social doctrine and he has the full support of his bishop, Monsignor Roberto Ospina from St. Peter’s Parish in Bogotá. What began as a terrifying kidnapping ended up becoming a doorway to new life.  —By Inside the Vatican Staff

#7. Dr. Ornella Parolini

Ornella Parolini is an Italian scientist whose research team in Italy is working on some of the most advanced stem cell therapies in the world. Her specialty is to study the cells from placentas.

She believes these placental cells can be used in effective stem cell therapies, making it unnecessary to consider the use of fetal cells (embryonic cells), something some scientists are proposing even though the use of fetal stem cells involves the destruction of fetuses.

We were privileged to meet with Dr. Parolini during a stem cell conference at the Vatican in November. She is a gracious, humble woman with extraordinary commitment to her faith and to the teaching of the Church.

For these reasons, we are pleased to include Dr. Parolini among our “Top Ten” people of 2011.

In 2009, Dr. Parolini and her team published an article in Cell Transplantation which showed that stem cells derived from human placentas may ultimately play a role in the treatment of lung diseases, such as pulmonary fibrosis and fibrotic diseases caused by tuberculosis, chemical exposure, radiation or pathogens.

These diseases can ultimately lead to loss of normal lung tissue and organ failure.

No known therapy effectively reverses or stops the fibrotic process.

Placenta-derived stem cells are known to be able to engraft in solid organs, including the lungs. Human term placenta stem cells also demonstrate characteristics of high plasticity and low immunogenicity.

“The potential application of fetal membrane-derived cells as a therapeutic tool for disorders characterized by inflammation and fibrosis is supported in previous studies,” Dr. Parolini, the study’s lead author, said. “In line with the hypothesis that cells derived from the amniotic membrane have immunomodulatory properties and have been used as an anti-inflammatory agent, we set out to evaluate the effects of fetal membrane-derived cell transplantation in chemically-treated (bleomycin) mice.”

According to Dr. Parolini, the procedure resulted in a significant anti-fibrotic effect on the lab animals. A “consistent” reduction in lung fibrosis, says Dr. Parolini, “provides convincing proof” that placenta-derived cells do confer benefits for bleomycin-induced lung injury.

In mid-November, the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Culture joined with a small American biotechnology company called NeoStem to host a remarkable conference in Rome. Dr. Parolini was present, along with 350 other scientists, religious figures, politicians, educators and industry representatives.

The 3-day conference highlighted the need for collaboration in research into adult stem cells. The conference and partnership with New York-based NeoStem is part of the Vatican’s recent $1 million, five-year initiative to promote adult stem cell therapies and research.

Called “Adult Stem Cells: Science and the Future of Man and Culture,” those present included Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, president of the Pontifical Council for Culture; Father Tomasz Trafny, head of the Council’s science department; Tommy G. Thompson, former US Secretary of Health and Human Services; and Dr. Robin Smith, president of the Stem for Life Foundation (the official partner for the conference) and chief executive of NeoStem, the company which backs the Foundation.

A chief concern of the conference was that medical researchers not harm human embryos during their research.

“We wish to raise some important and sometimes provocative questions, such as whether the Hippocratic oath should be extended to all the life sciences, because today it is not only doctors but also laboratory scientists who have power to intervene in all phases of human life,” Father Trafny said.

Transplants of adult stem cells have become a standard lifesaving therapy for people with leukemia, lymphoma and other blood diseases; and they are being studied in people who suffer from multiple sclerosis, heart attacks and diabetes. Some scientists, however, are lobbying for the use of embryonic cells to grow replacement tissue for diseases like Parkinson’s or diabetes, and many scientists believe the more flexible embryonic cells have great promise.

This is where Dr. Parolini comes in. By her focus on placental cells, she is discovering a source of stem cells that is extremely flexible, so much so that she believes there will be no need for scientists to seek to use embryonic cells with the immoral consequences that entails (the death of the embryos).

One speaker at the Vatican conference was Sharon Porter, who was diagnosed with systemic scleroderma, a chronic connective tissue disorder that leads to a hardening of the skin and internal organs. There is no cure, but three years ago she underwent a treatment to reboot her immune system: Adult stem cells were removed from her body, her immune system was destroyed and the stem cells were re-injected to build a new immune system.

“It changed my life,” Porter said. “It brought me back to where I was before I was diagnosed.” Contact: Ornella Parolini, ornella.parolini@tin.it —Robert Moynihan

#8. Mercedes Wilson

Mercedes Arzu Wilson is a “fighter for life,” one of the most prominent in the world. She has been part of Vatican delegations at United Nations conferences, has written books, has given lectures around the world, has prepared packages of materials and carried them to the post office, and has been a mother and grandmother.

We have come to know her personally, and for what she has done for so many around the world, we are pleased to name her as one of our “Top Ten” people of 2011.

Mercedes, born in Guatemala, now living not far from Wash­ington, D.C., with her husband, an American, is the founder and president of Family for the Americas.

Since 1968, her organization has taught millions in over 100 nations and in 20 different languages about Natural Family Planning (NFP), not only by teaching people how to practice it, but also how to themselves become teachers of NFP.

Her book Love and Fertility has been translated into 23 languages.

According to Wilson, pro-life approaches that focus strictly on abortion and ignore sex education and contraception will fail because they are missing the root of the problem.

According to Wilson, the source is the “corruption of innocence that eventually leads to the devaluation of human life, which is manifested through abortion and other sinful deeds.”

By handing out or encouraging the use of condoms and the pill, she said, schools encourage a mentality that expects sex without procreation.

She noted further that two out of three women who obtain abortions were using contraception when they got pregnant.

“Planned Parenthood knows that it’s not going to work, so they’re ready to offer the next service, which is induced abortion,” she said.

In recent years, she has become increasingly concerned about the push to have “brain death,” not “heart death,” as the new criterion to determine the moment of human death. The concern is that there have been a number of cases in which people who appear “brain dead” actually “wake up” again. Mercedes fears that some of the interest in having “brain death” declared the new “standard” of death has a commercial motivation: it would be lucrative to “harvest” the body organs of a person whose body was still living, but who was declared “brain dead.”

In 2005, in a message to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Pope John Paul II said that the Church has consistently supported “the practice of transplanting organs from deceased persons.”

However, he cautioned that transplants are acceptable only when they are conducted in a manner “so as to guarantee respect for life and for the human person.”

The Pope cited his predecessor, Pope Pius XII, who said that “it is for the doctor to give a clear and precise definition of death and of the moment of death.” He encouraged the Pontifical Academy to pursue that task.

“Our main work for the last 10 to 15 years has been training new teachers,” Mercedes says. “We have developed the most comprehensive training manual for training teachers in human sexuality and Natural Family Planning. We do this all over the world. We believe the most useful tools are the simplest materials. We have training manuals and posters, because many times the poor countries don’t have electricity. Our systems of posters teach the whole method for women undergoing every situation of the reproductive life, from fertility to pre-meno­pause.”

Non-natural or artificial types of birth control are very common in our world, and “Natural Family Planning” is often scorned as “impossible” and “ineffective.” But Mercedes believes the artificial methods not only tend to draw young people away from traditional sexual morality, but also are often physically harmful, dangerous for human health.

“In the US many women are still using the pill, but less, because the media has given some information on the negative side effects and people are getting scared,” Mercedes said. “Young people, however, are still using patches and other forms of contraception, and they are falling into this trap because society continues to lure them into being promiscuous; that is the main problem. In the third world, they are still using the 3-month injections. It does so much harm to the poor. They are given it while mothers are breastfeeding their babies. The steroids are going right through the breast milk to the babies and that is a calamity. It causes cancer, heart disease, you name it; the list is interminable. And with the lack of health facilities in the third world, it is criminal. The pill, IUDs, injections, and the patch are devastating to the poor because they all carry the same steroids, which are known to be toxic and carcinogenic. The World Health Organization in 2005 confirmed that estrogens in birth control methods are carcinogenic of the number one type, which is the most dangerous type of all.

“And then there is family life. A study of the most important work we have ever done confirms that married couples that practice NFP have a lower divorce rate than couples that use contraception. In couples where NFP was practiced, we found a miniscule .2% divorce rate.”  —Robert Moynihan

#9. Cardinal Kurt Koch

Pope Benedict has chosen a quiet, thoughtful, relatively young Swiss theologian to head the Holy See’s Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity and the Pontifical Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews. (Born as the Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity under Pope John XXIII in 1960, the dicastery was given its present name under Pope John Paul II in 1988 with the Ap­ostolic Constitution Pastor Bonus.)

His name is Cardinal Kurt Koch, and for his steady, much-needed work on behalf of deeper understanding between Christians, and between Christians and Jews, we honor him as one of our “Top Ten” people of 2011.

When Koch was appointed on July 1, 2010, as head of the Vatican’s ecumenical office, succeeding Cardinal Walter Kasper, who retired for reasons of age, he was already well known for his openness and deep ecumenical commitment.

Now, his first six months of work in his new post have shown the wisdom of the Pope’s choice.

Benedict XVI has made a habit of choosing as Vatican officials men with experience of the Church outside of Rome, especially as diocesan bishops. Koch was bishop of Basel, Switzerland, when Benedict called him to Rome in mid-summer.

Immediately upon his arrival, Pope Benedict asked then-Archbishop Koch to give the main talks at the annual gathering of scholars who had done their doctoral research with him when he was a professor in Germany (the Ratzinger Schuelerkreis, or student circle). Koch gave two thoughtful lectures at the meeting at the end of August: “The Second Vatican Council: Between Tradition and Innovation,” and a second on the Council’s document on the liturgy and the liturgical reforms it launched.

Named a cardinal in the consistory of November 20, 2010, Koch’s chief task now is to try to improve relations with the Eastern Orthodox and with the various Protestant denominations, in view of eventual closer unity with Rome.

Koch was born in Emmenbrücke, Switzerland. He studied theology at the Ludwig-Maximilians University in Munich and at the University of Lucerne, graduating in 1975 with a doctorate in theology. He was ordained to the priesthood in 1982 and ordained bishop of Basel by Pope John Paul II in 1995. He was named president of the Swiss Episcopal Conference in 2007 and held the post until 2010.

Koch received international “notice” in 2004 when he replied firmly to a widely-publicized petition letter asking that John Paul II retire from the papacy. Swiss intellectuals and theologians, priests and lay people alike, joined in the call, praising John Paul’s papacy for “moving the world” but saying the pontiff should respect the retirement age of 75 set for bishops. The letter was intentionally released on May 14 that year to coincide with John Paul’s 84th birthday on May 18, and with his then-looming visit to Switzerland. Koch made headlines when he said the decision to publish the letter as the Pope celebrated his birthday was “disgusting and disloyal.”

Two years later, replying to Swiss opposition to the building of minarets in Switzerland, Koch came out in favor of minarets and appealed for tolerance toward the Muslim community. In an interview with the NZZ am Sonntag newspaper, Koch said he had nothing against Muslims building minarets in Switzerland, but at the same time he expected respect for the religious freedom of Christians throughout the Muslim world.

“The bishop of Arabia, for example, is not allowed in certain countries to celebrate the Eucharist,” Koch said.

On that occasion, the bishop of Basel said people are often afraid of things that they don’t know and underlined, “Islam is something quite different from the terrorist aberrations that exist.”

In his first official visit in 2010, Koch traveled to Istanbul to talk with the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I and to celebrate the patronal feast of St. Andrew on November 30, an annual tradition since 1979. Asked recently about a possible meeting between Pope Benedict XVI and Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill, Koch was diplomatic: “Such a meeting is not on the agenda,” he said. “Both the Holy Father and His Holiness wish this meeting to take place, but it should be thoroughly prepared.”

So the Catholic-Orthodox dialogue continues. In November, in Belarus, Koch participated in an international conference on the theme: “Catholic-Orthodox Dialogue: The Ethical Values of Christianity as a Contribution to Social Life in Europe.” The conference “served to underline the desire to continue dialogue, and to develop concrete collaboration in promoting and defending Christian values in Europe.”

In October in Assisi, during the 25th anniversary of the 1986 interreligious meeting that took place in the same place, Koch said: “Let us remember that there is no peace without justice; that there is no justice without forgiveness.” Koch is a man with the strength of spirit and gentleness of heart to help bring about better relations between Christians despite centuries of separation, and we wish him well in his difficult but essential task. —Micaela Biferali

#10. Archbishop Pietro Sambi

Pietro Sambi was a diplomat, a man of dialogue, a man of peace, and we would like to honor him among the “Top Ten” of 2011, and mourn his passing.

He died on July 27 at the age of 73.

All who knew him loved him.

When the archbishop died in July, he left behind a large gap in the Church’s diplomatic service, which he had served loyally for more than 40 years.

But even more impressive was the impact he left upon people, regardless of their status in life.

Rare is the man who can treat each person like his friend, and who can talk to a shy layperson as easily as he can a powerful world leader. Pietro Sambi was such a man.

In many ways, he was the kind of priest and diplomat the Church strives to produce: charitable to all, whatever their viewpoints, while deeply devoted to the Catholic faith himself.

Born in central Italy in 1938, ordained in 1964, he studied theology and canon law in Rome before joining the Holy See’s diplomatic service in 1969. After serving in Cameroon, Cuba and Algeria, he became the Pope’s representative in Nicaragua in 1979 — soon after the overthrow of the repressive government of Anastasio Somoa and the installation of the Marxist-tinged Sandinista regime. In that capacity, wrote the New York Times, “Ambassador Sambi was often cast as a mediator between the many Catholic priests who held prominent offices in the Sandinista government and the Catholic bishops of Nicaragua, who opposed the priests’ participation in the apparatus of a socialist state.”

After becoming an archbishop in 1985, he spent 12 years in Burundi and Indonesia. His final two assignments, in Israel and in the United States, would make him internationally famous.

Pope John Paul II appointed Sambi the Holy See’s chief representative in Israel and apostolic delegate to Jerusalem in 1998, just in time to arrange for John Paul’s historic 2000 visit to the Holy Land. Though “diplomatic,” Sambi was also a man of great moral and spiritual force; he never failed to speak out against the evils of our age, particularly in the Middle East, where they run rampant.

At the same time, Sambi was a man of peace and made tireless efforts to resolve differences among communities in conflict. It was not just Christians who loved him; Jews and Muslims did as well. People of all faiths and political views trusted him and knew he would be fair whenever they sought him out.

Recognizing his considerable gifts, Pope Benedict XVI made him apostolic nuncio to the United States in 2005, one of Benedict’s very first appointments as Pope. Three years later, when Benedict made his April 2008 visit to the US, Sambi helped make that visit as successful and inspiring as John Paul II’s journey to the Holy Land.

Upon hearing of the nuncio’s passing, Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York, the president of the US bishops’ conference, paid him this tribute: “Archbishop Sambi understood and loved our nation. He traveled throughout the country, often to attend the ordination of bishops, always eager to meet the faithful and to share with them the affection that the Holy Father has for them and their country. He was open to the media as a conveyor of truth and welcomed journalists as representatives of the American people. He enjoyed everything from a stroll in the park near his residence in Washington to the diplomatic functions he attended as part of his service as the representative of the Holy See to the United States.

“Archbishop Sambi possessed both a keen sense of diplomacy cultivated through many years of service in the Vatican diplomatic corps, especially in Israel, and a pastoral sensitivity cultivated through his many years as a faithful and devoted priest. Those who met or listened to Archbishop Sambi understood that at the heart of all he did was this love of the priesthood and of Christ the Good Shepherd.”

If there was one issue that drove the good archbishop, it was his devotion to Catholic education. The son and brother of teachers, he understood how important education could be in shaping an individual’s life. His 2007 address to the National Catholic Education Association summed up his vision: “A young man, 22 years old, once took a piece of marble and sculpted in it two of the deepest human sentiments: suffering accepted from the hand of God does not diminish the beauty of the human person but increases it, and — second sentiment — even in death, a son continues to have full confidence in his mother. This is the Pietá of Michelangelo, that you can see everytime you enter the Basilica of St. Peter in Rome. Michelangelo, the author of the Pietá, is considered one of the greatest artists in the world.

“I don’t believe it! The greatest artists are the educators — are you — because you try to sculpt the best of yourselves, of who you are and what you know, not in a piece of marble, but in living, breathing human beings, who are the glory of God.”

For all he gave to the Church, let us remember and honor him. —William Doino, Jr.

 

Pope Pius XII: Friend and Rescuer of Jews

 

Pope Pius XII: Friend and Rescuer of Jews

The astonishing, almost unknown story of hundreds of Jewish refugees, shipwrecked in the Aegean Sea, who turned to Pope Pius XII for help

By William Doino, Jr.

Inside the Vatican, January, 2012, pp. 10-18

Editorial Note:

There has been no major figure of the World War II period (1939-1945) more inaccurately depicted than Eugenio Pacelli — Pope Pius XII (1939-1958). Perhaps the worst of these attacks come from a provocative 1960s play, and a 1990s book which claimed to be scholarly.

The first is Rolf Hochhuth’s stage drama, The Deputy (1963), which presented Pius as a cold, heartless bureaucrat, standing aloof from the horrors of the Holocaust, as he engaged in secret business dealings to enrich the Church. After creating a brief sensation, The Deputy was revealed to be a pure piece of propaganda — as contrived and inaccurate as the anti-Catholic fabrications once put out by the Nazis themselves.

The second assault on Pius’s character was John Cornwell’s Hitler’s Pope (1999), a purported work of scholarship, but, as respected historians showed, clearly a compendium of inaccuracies and prejudices. Cornwell argued that Pacelli assisted Hitler’s consolidation of power, and then, once the Holocaust began, failed to adequately resist it. Both primary archives and first-hand witnesses have demolished Cornwell’s thesis; and even Cornwell himself has corrected some of his most outrageous judgments. But the misconceptions of that book, like those of The Deputy, continue to resonate with a media little interested in historical truth, particularly when it involves the papacy.

The result has been a grave historical injustice: over and over, Pius XII has been presented to the general public as the most reprehensible Churchman imaginable—the Pope who remained silent during the genocide, or who actually colluded with the Nazis in the deaths of millions of Jews. Outstanding scholars— and many others of good will— know how untrue these allegations are; and the facts about Pius XII’s impressive record are reaching more people all the time. But the truth is that there is still widespread bias against Pius, and it will take considerable time to reverse and correct it.

We will not try to explain why Pius XII has been maligned for more than 50 years; that is a story requiring its own review— one that examines our age’s abysmal prejudice against Catholicism. We simply state this essential fact: more than 50 years of painstaking research, much of it by Jewish scholars, has repudiated every main charge against him, and proved him a singularly dedicated rescuer of Jews.

Last month, this magazine made the case that the almost irrational campaign against Pius was continuing, even in the face of massive evidence against it. This month we offer one clear, compelling example of Pius XII at work to embrace and care for Jews. The example we give has been partially known ever since Inside the Vatican published a newsflash about it in 2006, with commentary by William Doino, a highly-regarded Pius specialist (see pp. 17-18). That story received wide attention, much praise, some criticism, and, appropriately, requests for additional evidence. Now, after considerably more research, we present the full story behind the original newsflash. It is now a testimony with ample documentation, which we believe every fair-minded reader will find extraordinary. If ever a story deserved to be heard, bearing upon Pius XII’s conduct and character, and his true attitude toward the Jewish people, this is it. —­ Robert Moynihan, The Editor

===================

[Here below is the text of the article by William Doino, Jr.]

“And now, my Jewish friend, go with the protection of the Lord, and never forget, you must always be proud to be a Jew!”

The words are striking, and unforgettable. They serve as a comfort to anyone who has ever been the victim of anti-Semitism, and at the same time, a rebuke to those who’ve sanctioned it. They were spoken to a young Jewish refugee, in the fall of 1941, after he had just fled Nazi and fascist persecution, and was in desperate need of help. The man who spoke them-loudly, clearly, and in German, to a crowd filled largely with German soldiers— was none other than the Vicar of Christ himself.

The story of how Pope Pius XII embraced this young Jewish refugee — and what he said and did for him — is one of the most inspiring acts of the Second World War, but one that — amazingly — remains largely unknown. The dramatic encounter was first recorded by the young Jewish man himself, in an anonymous article entitled, “A Papal Audience in Wartime,” for the Palestine Post (today’s Jerusalem Post), on April 28, 1944, nearly three years after it took place; expanded upon in that same man’s subsequent German memoir (published in Israel at the end of the War) (1); and again in an English version, entitled, Long Journey Home, produced in 1966, which was apparently offered to major publishers but never — evidently — actually published. (2) The latter memoir is now stored in two prestigious historical institutions — the Leo Baeck Institute in New York (www.lbi.org), which makes it available in digitized form online, and the Wisconsin Historical Society (www.wisconsinhistory.org). It is upon these sources, and separate corroborating documents, that this account is based.

The Witness of Howard “Heinz” Wisla

Heinz Wisla, Berlin, Germany, (undated, but likely c. 1940, at age 20)

The name of our hero — the Jewish refugee who met Pius XII — is Howard Heinz Wisla, known simply as “Heinz” during his early years in Germany. Five years ago, when ITV promoted the aforementioned Palestine Post testimony in our newsflash, we did not know the man’s name, since the article was signed simply “Refugee.” But, thanks to his largely forgotten memoir, we now know what it is — and much more.

Born in Germany in 1920, Heinz Wisla seemed destined for a normal life, attending the universities of Berlin and Cambridge, majoring in languages, journalism and literature. With anti-Semitism rife at the time, however, life was a challenge for any European Jew, especially one living in Germany. Bravely remaining there, even after Hitler obtained power in 1933, Wisla’s fortunes changed radically as Hitler’s persecutions increased. In 1940, the Gestapo arrested Wisla, and threw him into the Sachsenhausen concentration camp (in Oranienburg, just north of Berlin), where hundreds of thousands were interned, and tens of thousands perished. Torture, starvation and summary executions were daily occurrences, an experience Wisla later described as an unrelenting “nightmare.” His life was saved only because his father, a decorated veteran of the Great War, reached out to his military friends, who were able to successfully intervene for his son.

Emaciated, and near the point of death, Heinz was released on condition he never speak of Sachsenhausen again, lest he be seized and executed, and that he leave Germany at once. As soon as he was physically able, he did so, though his parents and younger brother were not permitted to go with him: they remained behind, consigned to a forced labor factory, awaiting their own uncertain future.

Once outside the Reich, Wisla sought to escape Europe entirely, praying his family would survive, and trusting he would reunite with them later, after the terror passed.

A break came when he found out about the Pentcho, a clandestine steamer preparing to transport 500 Jewish refugees from Slovakia to Palestine. Through grit and good fortune, Heinz was able to secure a spot on board, believing it his ticket to freedom. His joy was shared by fellow passengers, who boarded the vessel singing the Hatikvah (“the Hope”), now the national anthem of Israel:

As long as in the heart, within,
A Jewish soul still yearns,
And onward, towards the ends of the east,
An eye still gazes toward Zion…

The Pentcho left Bratislava in the middle of 1940, en route to the ancient Jewish homeland. But what should have taken a month, and been a liberating journey, became a harrowing trial of hardship and despair. Neither the Pentcho, nor its passengers, were prepared for anything like what occurred on sea.

Their harrowing story is recounted in John Bierman’s remarkable book, Odyssey (1984), which sheds further light on Wisla’s testimony.

Historian Milton Meltzer summarizes the ship’s ordeal:

“Down the Danube they sailed on the rickety, leaking boat, past one country after another which refused to let them come in for food and water. After weeks aboard, the refugees were filthy and starving. Many jumped overboard to swim ashore, but they were forced back.

“It took almost five months to reach the Black Sea. With no lifeboats, no life preservers and no radio, the ship began a wild, aimless journey among the Greek islands.

“Then one day the boiler exploded, and the engine stopped. Bunk sheets were gathered, and the women sewed them up into sails.

“A storm drove the Pentcho onto the rocks of an uninhabited island in the Aegean Sea. The passengers managed to scramble ashore and watched the ship break into pieces and sink. Scouring the island for food, they could find no birds, no animals and no fresh water.

“Eleven terrible days passed. Then an Italian warship rescued them, only to put them into a concentration camp on the island of Rhodes.”(3)

Unlike the notorious camps run by Germany, the one at Rhodes wasn’t designed for death, and most of the local Italians treated the internees well. But they were still in a fascist camp, with restrictions; and because of an Allied blockade of this Axis-controlled island, food, medicine and other basic goods barely got through. The result was hunger, fever, disease and — tragically — death. Despite the best efforts of the Italian doctors on hand, a number of the Pentcho refugees perished; and many of the rest awaited an identical fate. As their isolation and agony increased, the internees sent open telegrams to the world’s leaders, hoping they would respond favorably.

Occasionally, rumors of a rescue would arise, only to quickly dissipate. Four of the male internees tried to flee Rhodes, for nearby Turkey, but two were immediately accosted, and the other two drowned. The internees felt doomed, virtually without hope.

What happened next is crucial to understanding the evils of anti-Semitism, and how Pius XII reacted to them.  In the summer of 1941, Wisla — suddenly and unexpectedly — received news that relatives had secured a special transit visa for him, enabling him to escape detention at Rhodes, and travel to Rome. Elated, but sorrowful to leave his fellow Jews behind, Wisla bid an emotional farewell to them, promising he would do “everything possible” to save them, once he arrived in Rome.

Wisla Keeps His Promise

Having immediately taken to Rome and its people, Heinz soon found allies for his mission. A kindly German priest arranged for Heinz to meet Pius XII at one of his special audiences, allowing for a direct appeal to the Pope for the imprisoned shipwrecked refugees, back at Rhodes. When the dramatic moment came, Wisla was part of a large gathering, including many German soldiers passing by, and the last to approach the pontiff. Noticing how shy and anxious the young man was, the Pope immediately put Heinz at ease. The exchange that followed brought forth Pius XII’s compassion, and full awareness of what it meant to be Jewish at that time, in a world overcome by hatred. The language used by the Pope is important, for it speaks directly to Pius XII’s love for his fellow human beings —God’s children, as he saw them — without distinction of race, color or creed.

That love has often been questioned, particularly by those ready to believe the worst about the Roman pontiffs. Academic authors Nicholas Atkin and Frank Tallett, for example, assert that Pius XII had “a predisposition to a traditional anti-Semitism which clouded his judgment.” (4) But Wisla’s first-hand testimony shows the exact opposite to be the case. After Heinz told the Pope who he was, and what he believed could be accomplished, through papal intervention, Wisla recorded Pius XII’s extraordinary response:

“Then Pope Pius XII said: ‘You have done well, my Jewish friend, to come to me and tell me what has happened down there in the Italian islands. I have heard about it before. Will you come back, my son, in a few days with a written report and give it to my Secretary of State who is dealing with this particular refugee problem? But now to you, my young friend. You are Jewish. I know what that means in these times we live in. I do hope that you will always be proud to be a Jew!

“And then the Pope raised his voice so that everybody in the room could hear it even more clearly: ‘My son, whether you are worthier than others, only the Lord knows, but believe me, you are at least as worthy as any other human being on our earth before the Lord. And now, my Jewish friend, go with the protection of the Lord Almighty, and never forget: Be always proud to be a Jew.”(5)

A more heartfelt and eloquent repudiation of anti-Semitism could hardly be imagined; and that it was done in front of German officers during the Holocaust makes it all the more significant. What is particularly striking, from a historical and theological perspective, is Pius XII’s unqualified assertion of the equality of Jews and Christians — a correction to the centuries-old “teaching of contempt,” which led so many Christians to think themselves superior to Jews, and abuse them relentlessly.

Following Pius XII’s encouragement, Wisla followed through with a report to the papal Secretariat of State, and was not disappointed. A short time later, in the winter of 1941-1942, he wrote excitedly of “some good news, too. Owing to the personal intervention of Pope Pius XII, a Red Cross ship has picked up the starving 500 refugees from the internment camp on the isle of Rhodes and brought them safely to the Italian mainland. Here they are now being placed in a comfortable internment camp in southern Italy” — the Ferramonti di Tarsia camp, near Cosenza, in the region of Calabria — and “the Vatican issued directions to the Italian Government to treat my former comrades there with special care.”(6)

The importance of this intervention cannot be overstated, for if the shipwrecked Jews at Rhodes had not been transferred to the humane camp at Ferramonti in 1942, they would have either starved or suffered the same fate of the island’s indigenous Jews two years later.

As Yad Vashem’s Holocaust center notes: “The Allies invaded Italy in September 1943; just days later the German army occupied Rhodes. In June 1944 Anton Burger, one of Adolf Eichmann’s assistants, arrived in Rhodes to supervise the deportation of the island’s Jews. The Jews were ordered to appear at various assembly centers by mid-July. On July 20, the Jewish males were arrested (only a few avoided arrest and joined the partisans). Accompanied by their wives and children, the prisoners were sent to Athens, and then on to Auschwitz. Upon arrival, 400 of the 1,800 Jews were chosen for hard labor, the rest were executed immediately. Only 150 survived the War.”(7)

Equally remarkable is that the Holy See went out of its way to help Wisla get to Spain (from whence he would travel to Portugal, then out of Europe altogether), as he learned from the Spanish Consulate in Rome: “Obviously, when I called on Pope Pius XII and later presented my memorandum to his minister of state, I must have told them about my visa difficulties. They must have instructed their Nuncius in Madrid to intervene on my behalf, who then did just that successfully.” (8)

How Wisla survived over the next several years, moving from one location to the next, often underground as a black marketer, and even spy, are stories all unto themselves — detailed in the rest of his memoir — but we limit ourselves here to the narrative related above.

In early 1944, Heinz, still in Portugal, finally received an official British mandate permit to enter Palestine. Thanks to the persistence and generosity of his friend Wilfrid Israel — a little-known but heroic businessman who helped many persecuted Jews flee wartime Europe (9) — Wisla was able to board the Nyassa, a famous refugee ship, which reached Haifa (now the largest city in northern Israel) in February of that year.

One can only imagine the ex­hilaration Wisla felt when he at last reached the Promised Land, but his joy was tempered by tragedy: in the summer of 1943, his last letters to his parents and brother in Berlin were returned, stamped “Addressat Unbekannt” (Address Un­known). Neighbors then wrote Heinz to tell him the heartbreaking news: his family had been “sent to the East.” Knowing what that invariably meant — death in the Nazi extermination camps in Poland — Wisla found himself in a state of shock, and spent days walking alone on the beaches of Portugal, trying to heal from the pain. Now, in his new home of Palestine, his recovery continued, as he tried to build a new life.

With all this going on, it is astonishing that Heinz made it a point to set down in writing, and just a few months after reaching the Holy Land, his gratitude to Pius XII in his Palestine Post testimony. Whether it was his decision, or an editor’s, to sign the piece as “Refugee,” is unknown — but it is a beautiful recollection, and one that deserves recognition in any discussion of Pius XII.

According to US government records, Howard Heinz Wisla (he apparently Anglicized his name after emigrating to America) passed away in 2004, after becoming a sales manager. Were his account the only testimony of Pius XII’s goodness, some might doubt it. But there is additional evidence which confirms essential elements of his narrative.

In his aforementioned book, Odyssey, John Bierman mentions Wisla in passing, but documents his audience with the Pope:

“One internee who did leave Rhodes at about this time [1941] was an Austrian [actually, he was German] named Heinz Wisla. Having acquired a Portuguese visa, he was allowed to leave for Lisbon via Rome. Before he left, the governing committee drew up a petition which he promised he would try to present to the Pope.

“In a letter to Rhodes from Lisbon some weeks later, Wisla reported that he had taken the petition to the Vatican, where he was granted an audience with Pius XII.”

Bierman then quotes Wisla, describing Pius XII’s welcome reception: “After the Pope had blessed them [the audience] I was able to present the petition. He promised to do what he could.’” (emphasis added) (10)

Even earlier than Bierman, Perez Leshem, writing about Rescue efforts during the War, for the 1969 Leo Baeck Yearbook, mentions Wisla’s 1945 German memoir: “Wisla later wrote a book on his experiences as a refugee and his emigration on the SS Nyassa [under the pen name] Ben-Zwi Kalischer (Heinz Wisla), Vom Konzentrationslager nach Palaestina Flucht durch die halbe Welt [From Concentration Camp to Palestine: Flight Halfway Around the World](11); and in 2002, the Italian anthology, L’ombra lunga dell’esilio: ebraismo e memoria [“The Long Shadow of Exile: Judaism and Memory”] published an essay by Klaus Voigt, on the writings of Jewish refugees, which comments:

“The book by Heinz Wisla, From Concentration Camp to Palestine: Flight Halfway Around the World, is worthy of mention above all for the description of the audience granted to the author by Pius XII. Except for the description of the situation of the concentration camp of Sachsenhausen, the text has conserved elements characteristic of a diary. Wisla was among the passengers on the ‘Pentcho,’ the vessel that was shipwrecked in the Aegean on the way to Palestine. The more than 500 refugees were saved by the Italian military navy and then interned on Rhodes. Wisla was the only one who had permission to take an airplane to Italy, since he possessed a visa for Cuba, before the entire group was transferred to Ferramonti-Tarsia. The audience with the Pope took place in the middle of, or amidst, German soldiers in uniform. The Pope agreed to his request for help for the shipwrecked interned on Rhodes and concluded the colloquio with the words that could be heard even by the soldiers, ‘Always be proud of being a Jew.’ From Italy, Wisla went by air to Barcelona and from there, with false documents, to Portugal, which he left in the spring of 1944 with the first transport to Palestine organized by the Jewish Agency.”(12)

These obscure references to Wisla are brief and scattered, but key to establishing the contours and outlines of his testimony.

Far more important, however, is that there is a second witness — another passenger of the Pentcho, and internee at Rhodes — who has re-inforced Wisla’s testimony.

The Second Witness: Herman Herskovic

In 1964, in the wake of Hochhuth’s malicious attack, the L’Osservatore della Domenica — a weekly edition of the Vatican newspaper — put out a special 80-page issue in Italian documenting the humanitarian interventions of Pius XII. At the time, the Associated Press called it “the most comprehensive defense of Pius XII’s wartime role to appear in a Vatican publication.”(13)

Though very difficult to obtain, ITV has acquired a full copy. Entitled (in English) “The Pope, Yesterday and Today,” it contains articles and first-hand accounts, by both Catholics and non-Catholics, testifying on behalf of Pius.

Among them is a gripping article entitled, “Devo la Vita al Papa,” [in English, “I Owe My Life to the Pope”; see full text in the box below] by one Herman Herskovic (1921-1983), originally from Czechoslovakia, who recounted how he had been part of a group of Jews, fleeing wartime Europe for Palestine, who had been adrift on a former cattle boat for months; who were cast up on a tiny island, and finally ended up in an Italian prison camp at Rhodes.

In all essentials, Herskovic’s narrative converges with that of Wisla’s, especially when Herskovic de­scribes how “the father of one of my comrades obtained the freedom of his son.” The latter — obviously Wisla — during his journey to the north, “was received in audience by Pius XII,” continues Herskovic. “Pius XII listened attentively to him and promised his intervention with the Italian government. Two weeks later, we were transferred to a safer concentration camp in Calabria” — the Ferramonti di Tarsia camp.(14)

That camp, which preserved the lives of the the Pentcho’s Jewish refugees — and several thousand more — has been described by the Jerusalem Post as “an unexpected haven” during the Holocaust. It was “a place where they could avoid the horrors of the German concentration camps.”(15)

What is especially significant about this camp is how much Pius XII and his representatives protected its internees. As Herskovic’s testimony recounts, and as Mario Rende notes in his book, Ferramonti di Tarsia (see page 12), the inmates fear of being handed over to the Germans was constant (especially after the Allies landed at Sicily, and the Germans began to retreat north). But, as Rende shows, the Vatican appealed to the Italian government numerous times, to prevent deportation of its internees, and thus helped save them. Not only were Ferramonti’s prisoners not handed over to the Germans, but there was no random violence against them, as there were in so many other Axis-run camps. The surviving Jews were extremely grateful. (16)

The Osservatore Romano is not the only source Herskovic shared his dramatic testimony with. In 1975, he gave a series of five interviews to the late Judah Rubinstein (a chronicler of Jewish life), for a Holocaust Survivors project, and the transcripts of these interviews are now stored at the New York Public Library oral history division.(17)

In the second interview of the series, dated January 29, 1975, Herskovic recounts his whole harrowing journey on the Pentcho in considerable detail, describing how it sank, how the refugees washed up on a forsaken island, and how they were then picked up by the Italian forces and interned at Rhodes, until they were at last taken to the life-saving Ferramonti camp on the Italian mainland. At that point — just as Wisla affirms in his own memoir — Herskovic states: “The Pope arranged with the Red Cross that they should transfer us from the island [Rhodes] to the motherland.”(18)

Herskovic also mentions how another one of the Jewish internees — evidently, someone other than Wisla — contacted his father, who knew a Slovakian bishop, who in turn “got in touch with Pope Pius” for help. This may explain why Pius XII told Wisla, after hearing his plea for the refugees on Rhodes, “I have heard about it before” and that his Secretary of State was dealing with the crisis. That the Pope — and one of his bishops, in a land scarred by anti-Semitism — were so open to Jewish ap­peals during the war speaks volumes about their good will.

Of the Red Cross ship (19) which moved them to the Italian mainland, then to Ferramonti, Herskovic continued, “We got a hot meal, we had a blanket” and “we could sleep on a bed.” The starving refugees, whom Pius XII had successfully helped transfer to safety, “realized what living again means,” said Herskovic.(20)

 Additional Documents: The Holy See’s Actes et Documents and the Red Cross
The oral and written testimonies by Wisla and Herskovic are stunning, and stand by themselves; but there are additional documents not to be overlooked.

The Vatican has published eleven thick volumes (actually twelve, since one is in two parts) of wartimes Actes et Documents, with the remaining wartime archives to be released in the next few years: although not an exhaustive collection of every one of the Pope’s humanitarian acts during the war (there were far too many, and/or were done secretly, or orally, and never preserved on paper), volume 8 of Actes does contain several important references to the Pentcho refugees, two of which stand out. Document 348, dated April 14, 1942, from the Jewish internees at Ferramonti (including the Pentcho refugees, recently arrived from Rhodes) expresses deep thanks to the Pope for his bountiful gift of clothing, following money he had already sent, distributed by his representative, Father Callisto Lopinot: “This wonderful gift is a fresh proof of the concern of your Holiness, which all the world admires, for your care not only for Catholics but all people of the world.” The papal gift, said the internees, fulfilled the words of the prophet Isaiah: “Clothing the naked when you see them, and not turning your back…” (Chapter 58:7)

Document 371, dated May 8, 1942, from “the families of the group of the shipwrecked of Rhodes, who, after so many travels and sufferings, have found a loving welcome in Ferramonti,” is equally effusive: “The Holy Father has demonstrated once again his paternal concern for all those suffering from the sorrowful events of the moment, without distinction of confession; he has filled with joy their hearts and they will never, ever forget the goodness of the Holy Father which will remain impressed forever in their hearts.”

In addition, since both witnesses mentioned the Red Cross in their testimonies, ITV contacted the International Red Cross Committee (ICRC) in Geneva, to see if  they — or their affiliate, the Italian Red Cross — had any information whatsoever about the Pentcho, its passengers, and their internment at Rhodes and Ferramonti.

After months of generous cooperation and research, the ICRC’s archivist sent us a file pertaining to the Pentcho and its passengers, the most important of which was a letter dated January 24, 1941. It was sent by the Governor of the Italian islands in the Aegean See, and communicated to the Prisoner of War Office of the Italian Red Cross, attached with a list of prisoners shipwrecked from the Pentcho, who had been collected at the San Giovanni Camp at Rhodes: number 53 on the list was “Heinz Wisla”; number 59 was “Hermann Herschkowitz” (spelled slightly differently than his English spelling). There is precious little else about the conditions under which the Jewish refugees were held at Rhodes, or how they were transferred to Ferramonti, because of the “personal intervention of Pope Pius XII” to quote Wisla; but Wisla and Herskovic’s respective testimonies — along with Bierman’s book, Odyssey — provide the crucial missing details.

One of the most moving passages in that work is Bierman’s description of what happened when the Jewish refugees’s faced their most anxious moment: “Then a rumor swept Ferramonti that the Italians were going to transfer all to a camp in northern Italy, prior to handing them over to the Germans. Greatly alarmed, the camp committee sent an urgent plea to the Vatican, begging for the Pope’s intervention. At the instructions of Pius XII, the Papal Nuncio, Cardinal Borgongini Duca(21), travelled to Calabria to reassure the internees. The children of Ferramonti lined up to greet him with a song of welcome… and the cardinal told them that so far as the Holy See was aware no such move was intended. If it were, he promised, the Pope would vigorously oppose any attempt to have them moved. He concluded by quoting the 137th Psalm — ‘By the waters of Babylon, we sat down and wept when we remembered thee, O Zion’ — and predicting ‘God willing, you will return to the Promised Land one day.’”(22)

The cardinal was a prophet: many of the Pentcho refugees, including Wisla, did indeed reach the Promised Land; and others, like Herskovic, found hope and freedom in America, where they began new lives. Now, thanks to this astonishing evidence, so long forgotten or overlooked, we know who was one of their greatest benefactors and kindest friends: Pope Pius XII.

[End of text by William Doino, Jr. Here follow supplementary materials.]

========================

Pope Pius XII Aided Jewish Prisoners of Fascist Concentration Camp

June 04, 2009

The June 4 edition of L’Osservatore Romano in­cludes a review of Mario Rende’s Ferramonti di Tarsia, a new book that chronicles an Italian fascist concentration camp where Jews were treated with relative humanity, thanks to the efforts of Paolo Salvatore, the camp’s director, and Capuchin Father Callisto Lopinot, the camp’s chaplain. In an audience of October 29, 1944, Jan Hermann, speaking on behalf of other former prisoners, thanked Pope Pius XII for his “remarkable and generous gifts” twice given through Cardinal Francesco Borgongini Duca, for his open “support [for] our rights to human dignity,” and for preventing the prisoners’ deportation to Poland in 1942.

==========================

I OWE MY LIFE TO THE POPE

By Herman Herskovic

Herman Herskovic (1921-1983), one of the Jewish refugees saved by Pius XII

My name is Herman Herskovic and I am 43 years old. My parents were Jews and lived in Czechoslovakia. During the last war, I was forced to abandon the country to flee from the Nazi persecution. Today I live in Cleveland where I am a furniture dealer. But I would never have reached America if it had not been for Pope Pius XII.

I read that Hochhuth, in his “The Deputy,” accuses Pope Pacelli of indifference with regard to the fate of millions of Jews. This accusation immediately seemed to me profoundly unjust toward a person who had done so much for others. So I said to myself: “If Pius XII were alive, he could defend himself. But since he is not, you must at least recount how the Pope saved your life. And how he saved the lives of several hundred Jews who were with you.”

In 1940, with a group of fellow Jews, we prepared a plan to take refuge in Palestine. We rented a vessel, normally used to transport cattle. And we engaged a captain, known as a cocaine addict. Given the risks of the undertaking, he was the best who could be found for the job. The 15th of June, we embarked from Bratislava, 500 of us, men, women and children.

The plan was to sail down the Danube to the Black Sea and there transfer to a larger vessel. According to the calculations, the river journey was to take four days. Four months later we were still on the little boat, sleeping on the benches, hungry, without water, and without radio communications. Having arrived at the mouth of the Danube, we had a rude surprise. The ship we were supposed to tranfer to, had left. We pointed the prow of the old and unsafe boat toward the south and entrusted our lives to the Lord.

They were terrifying days. The old boat was like a box of matches. Everyone had to remain quietly in his or her place. If 10 people got up to move around at the same time, the boat would have capsized. In Istanbul, a police craft prevented us from entering the port and to replenish our food and water supplies. After havinge traversed the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles, we reached the Aegean Sea.

The misadventures were not over. The boiler did not stand up to the strain and cracked. The ship wandered for hours and hours, before striking against the rocks of an island and sinking. By swimming we reached the shore. For 11 days, our only food was raw fish. We were then collected by an Italian ship and tranferred to a prison camp on the island of Rhodes.

From there, some of my companions were able to contact family members at home. The father of one of my comrades obtained the freedom of his son, with permission to travel to Switzerland. During his journey to the north, the young man stopped in Rome and was received in audience by Pius XII. To the Pope he recounted all of our story and he told him also of our fears due to the presence of German troops on the island of Rhodes. Pius XII listened attentively to him and promised his intervention with the Italian government. Two weeks later, we were transferred to a safer concentration camp in Calabria.

When the Allies landed in Sicily, our fears were renewed. We feared that the Germans, while retreating, would massacre us. It was then that the Church intervened to help us. The chaplain of the “lager” persuaded the guards to allow us to escape prior to the arrival of the SS. For three days we hid in a forest. And when we came back to the camp, it was already under the control of Allied soldiers.

With all the healthy men of the group, I enrolled in the Czechoslovak brigade of the British Army fighting until the liberation of Europe. At the end of the war I emigrated to the United States. Toward the Germans, despite everything, I do not feel any excessive anger, because I think that the majority of the population was misled. I know however for certain that many people, in many places, did not help the Jews. It is not just to accuse Pius XII for something that was not under his control. Personally I owe him a great deal and I thought it right to tell my story.  (Published in L’Osservatore della Domenica, June 26-28, 1964, page 72)

==================================

The Palestine Post, April 28, 1944; Page 6

A Papal Audience in Wartime

By “Refugee”

The author of this article arrived in this country in the refugee ship Nyassa.

It is on a sunny Wednesday morning in the autumn of 1941. An up-to-date Roman bus takes me from the center of the Eternal City to the Vatican. In the pocket of my dark suit I have a permit to enter the Palace of Vatican City for an audience with His Holiness Pope Pius XII.

As the bus crosses the Tiber, I can see the complex of Hadrian’s Tomb. A moment later we arrive at the huge square in front of St. Peter’s.

The portal di bronzo, leading to the Governmental Palace, is guarded by foot soldiers, who look like the lansquenets of some centuries ago. They are the Swiss Guards, and their multicolored uniforms and polished halberds and swords seem to be taken from a museum. An officer with a big moustache gives me the pass permit, the Guards take up their halberds and salute while I enter the Palace and mount a staircase. On the second floor a footman, in tight velvet trousers, shows me into a vestibule, where about 80 people are waiting. Among them are many German soldiers, in field uniform, their caps in their hands. For about an hour I stand around or pace the parquet floor among those warriors of Herr Hitler — probably on their way to Benghazi and Tripoli, anxious not to miss the chance of taking a papal blessing with them for further heroic deeds.

After some time we are led into another hall, its walls are decorated with oil paintings, antique engravings and maps. We then pass through a corridor into another anti-chamber, and, finally we stand before huge double doors ornamented with gold.

One of the Papal under-secretaries appears and gives us instructions about what to say to His Holiness and how to behave. Then one after the other, we are allowed to enter the richly furnished hall, where the Pope receives visitors.

I am the last one to enter, after the German soldiers. The Pope, sitting in a throne-like armchair, dressed in magnificent vestments, resembles some wise doctor, a good friend. His eyes shine in a friendly way through gold-rimmed glasses as each petitioner kneels to kiss the ring on the thin fingers of the Father’s right hand.

The Pope speaks to everybody — asking the soldiers in fluent German from which part of the Reich they come and whether they have a special wish. And he speaks so naturally and so simply that one cannot but feel his benevolent influence. Afterwards the Holy Father gives his benediction and hands over the petitions to his retinue: cardinals, bishops and other high dignitaries of Mother Church, officials of the Vatican Government, secretaries and diplomats. They stand respectfully in the background behind the audience chair, dressed in richly colored garments of mediaeval style.

At last it is my turn. I step forward, feeling very uneasy and shy. Then I kneel down on a velvet cushion, bow over the Papal hand, and breathe a kiss on the ring.

Then I look up and address him, stammering some Italian phrases.

But the Pope interrupts me; — “My son, you can speak your own language with me; you are German, too, aren’t you?”—
— “No, your Holiness, I was only born in Germany. But I am not a German any longer — I am a Jew.”—
— “So you are a Jew, what can I do for you? Tell me, my son!” —

I begin to explain why I have come. I report about the shipwrecked Jewish refugees, saved by Italian warships in the Aegean Sea and now starving in a prisoner of war camp on one of the islands. The Pope listens carefully to my explanations of how to help these poor people either by taking them to Palestine or by bringing them back to Italy to avoid epidemics and further starvation. Then Pius XII says: “You have done well to come to me and tell me this. I have heard about it before. Come back tomorrow with a written report and give it to the Secretary of State who is dealing with the question. But now for you, my son. You are a young Jew. I know what that means and I hope you will always be proud to be a Jew!” And the Pope raises his voice that everybody in the hall can here it clearly, “My son, whether you are worthier than others only the Lord knows, but believe me, you are at least as worthy as every other human being that lives on our earth! And now, my Jewish friend, go with the protection of the Lord, and never forget, you must always be proud to be a Jew!”

After having pronounced these words in his pleasant voice, the Pope lifts his hands to give the usual benediction. But he stops, smiles and his wonderful fingers only touch my head. Then he lifts me from my kneeling position…..

I join the others by the wall, not caring for the expression on their faces. Have they heard it too?

Now the Holy Father, Pope Pius XII, rises from his chair, spreads out his hands over us and speaks the general benediction. I bow my head.
Afterwards, after leaving the Palace, I walk alone across the piazza before St. Peters, back to the Tiber embankment. I sit down on a bench looking at the Eternal City, at Rome, her ruins and palaces, at the Capital on which the sun shines brightly from a Roman sky.

=====================

ENDNOTES

1. Heinz Wisla’s 159-page German memoir is entitled, Vom Konzentrationslager nach Palaestina: Flucht durch die halbe Welt [“From Concentration Camp to Palestine: Flight Halfway Around the World”], under the pen name, Ben-Zwi Kalischer, Edition Olympia-Martin Feuchtwanger, Tel Aviv 1945 (Hebrew version, Ba Derech l’Eretz Israel, Am-oved, 1945).

2. The 100-page (single-space typed) English-language manuscript at the Leo Baeck archives is stamped “Bertha Klausner International Literary Agency” indicating it was marketed; but there is no evidence we could find that it was ever accepted or published by an American publisher. The Library of Congress does not list it in its collections. The World catalog (www.worldcat.org) does, but mentions only its computerized form, available, as indicated, from the Leo Baeck Institute, under the aegis of the Center for Jewish History (www.cjh.org) in New York.

3. Milton Meltzer, Never to Forget: The Jews of the Holocaust (HarperCollins, 1991), p. 47.

4. Nicholas Atkin and Frank Tallet, Priests, Prelates and People: A History of European Catholicism Since 1750 (Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 260.

5. From Wisla’s English-language memoir, Long Journey Home, “Roman Experiences and the Pope,” Chapter 9. Note that the description of what Pius XII said is virtually the same as the account Wisla published, under the name “Refugee,” for the Palestine Post on April 28, 1944, and reprinted in ITV’s October 25, 2006 newsflash, “Pope Pius XII: Be Proud to be a Jew!”

6. From Long Journey Home, Chapter 10, “Underground in Italy as Blackmarketeer and Assistant Spy.”

7. “Rhodes,” Shoah Resource Center, via www.yadvashem.org

8. Long Journey Home, Chapter 10.

9. For more on Israel, see Naomi Shephard’s biography, A Refuge from Darkness: Wilfrid Israel and the Rescue of the Jews (Pantheon Books, 1984). Shepherd mentions Wisla and his interaction with Israel briefly: see pp. 241, 249 and 251.

10. John Bierman, Odyssey (Simon and Schuster, 1984), pp. 157-158.

11. See endnote #1.

12. “La memorialistica dei profugi ebrei I Italia dopo il 1933” [“The Memorializing of Jewish Refugees in Italy after 1933”] by Klaus Voigt, pp. 167-189, at page 177, in L’ombra lunga dell’esilio: ebraismo e memoria, edited by Maria Antonietta Santora, et al., Casa Editrice Giuntina, 2002).

13. “Vatican Weekly Defends Pius XII,” AP, June 26, 1964, as published in The Washington Post, June 27, 1964, p. E22.

14. L’Osservatore della Domenica, June 26-28, 1964, p. 72.

15. “An Unexpected Haven,” via the Jerusalem Post’s internet website, in collaboration with Italy Magazine.

16. For additional details on Rende’s book, see, “Il lager che salvo migliaia di ebrei,” by Gaetano Vallini, in L’Osservatore Romano, June 9, 2009.

17. 150 pages of the Herskovic transcripts from the five interviews he gave: Oral Histories, Box 185 no 1, New York Public Library.

18. Page 50 of the Herskovic transcripts.

19. The “Red Cross ship” could also have been an Italian troop or navy ship with authorized Red Cross workers on it. Italy’s wartime government and its country’s Red Cross often worked together.

20. Page 50, Herskovic transcripts.

21. Francesco Borgongini Duca (1884-1954) was the Apostolic Nuncio to Italy during World War II, when he was an archbishop; he became a Cardinal in 1953.

22. John Bierman, Odyssey, p. 198.