May 22, 2013

Letter #40: Christmas Eve

December 24, 2012, Monday — Waiting

Pope Benedict had some words for all of us on the eve of Christmas.

“Truth takes us by the hand”

In one of the Pope’s recent Twitter messages — the Pope began sending occasional “tweets,” as the messages are called, on December 12, and is now “followed” by more than 2 million people — he said something worth meditating on this Christmas.

“We do not possess the truth, the truth possesses us,” the Pope wrote several days ago. “Christ, who is the truth, takes us by the hand.”

Perhaps it is worth repeating: “We do not possess the truth. The truth possesses us…”

There is much room for reflection just in these two phrases. For example, this “personification” of truth as something which can “possess” a person — as if truth itself is personal, alive, conscious — may be as profoundly comforting as it may be surprising. That is, when we have come — as it appears we humans are trying to come — into the knowledge (“gnosis“) of all the “things” of the universe, knowing the “truth” about everything from atoms and molecules and geology and astronomy and cosmology to forces and vectors and radiation and gravity and magnetism, and more, we will be in possession, still, of mere facts, mere “things,” luminous and lovely, but ultimately impersonal. Having surveyed and grasped (possessed) all the things under heaven, we will still simply be on the path toward being possessed by something still higher than all of this, the transcendent, the metaphysical, the personal… the divine, who, by definition, is utterly and eternally worthy, because holy…

But here is not the place for a lengthy reflection; it is almost Christmas!

The essential point of the Pope in this message is this: when truth seems far away, when we fall into confusion and fear, the way forward, the way out of confusion and toward truth, toward the peace of faith which comes from knowing and assenting to the truth, is receptivity… to receive from outside of ourselves the truth which we may have lost sight of, which may have become obscured for us.

In other words, when we are lost, we do not have to find our own way home; someone else will come to find us and bring us home.

The value of this teaching is that, if followed, it frees us from the heavy burden of feeling we must cut through all confusion, all doubt, on our own, through our own reasoning, by our own power of intellect. This is a heavy burden indeed, under which many stagger and, in the end, fall.

No, the Pope is saying, that is not the way.

Rather, the way is to place onself in an attitude of receptivity, of expectation, in order for the light of God, of His truth, to shine upon us, into whatever dark spaces there may be within us — especially at Christmas…

And this attitude of receptivity, or expectation, is, of course, the essence of Advent… to await the arrival of the expected Messiah.

Pope Benedict alluded to this same attitude of receptivity and trusting expectation when he prayed the noon Angelus yesterday.

From his study window overlooking St. Peter’s Square, addressing pilgrims and tourists gathered below on the fourth, and final, Sunday of Advent, Benedict reflected on the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary to her cousin, Elizabeth — the Gospel reading for the day.

“The episode does not represent a mere gesture of courtesy, but dramatizes with great simplicity the encounter of the Old Testament with the New Testament,” the Pope said.

For Benedict, the meeting between Elizabeth and Mary, both pregnant, was that “watershed moment” when the Old Testament, reaching its fulfillment (that fulfillment would come some 33 years later, in the events of Good Friday and Easter Sunday) met the New Testament.

The new covenant was about to begin to be “actuated,” or had just started to be actuated, after so long a period of waiting.

Elizabeth, elderly and yet, miraculously, fertile, is a figure of all Israel awaiting the Messiah, Benedict said.

The expression Elizabeth utters when she greets Mary — “Blessed art thou among women” — is one that, in the Hebrew Scriptures, is spoken to the warrior women Jael and Judith, whose efforts saved the nation of Israel from peril, he said.

“Now, it (this expression) is spoken to the gentle young woman who shall, before too long, give birth to the Savior of the World,” he said.

And so, in a sense, this meeting between Mary and Elizabeth is the first meeting between Judaism and Christianity, though both of the women are Jewish, and Christianity has not yet even begun to exist — except in the sense that Mary has already conceived Christ in her womb.

So this meeting between two Jewish women is also between two Christian women, that is, two followers of the Christos, the Messiah, who is already present in Mary’s womb, though he is not yet visible in the world.

At the moment of this epochal meeting, the two women embraced.

The two faiths were not yet sundered, because there was not yet any reason for their sundering.

Elizabeth and Mary embraced, and greeted each other, with much affection and love.

So the story of the Visitation expresses the beauty of mutual receiving and welcoming, the Pope said.

“Wherever there are those who welcome one another, where there is careful attention, wherever there are people who make room for another,” Benedict said, “there is God – and the joy that comes from Him.”

He added: “Let us imitate Mary in the Christmas season, visiting to those who are experiencing difficulty, especially the sick, the imprisoned, the elderly and little children, and let us also imitate Elisabeth, who received her guest as God, Himself.”

The Pope concluded by asking the faithful to pray that all men might seek God earnestly, and find that it is “God Himself who comes first to visit us.”

And so, as in the Pope’s teaching above, it is God who comes first to visit us, no matter what dark night we may be passing through, who comes toward us, who takes us by the hand…

After praying the Angelus, Pope Benedict greeted the pilgrims below in many languages. In English he said:

“Today, as we approach the Solemnity of our Lord’s Birth among us, let us strive again to make room in our hearts to welcome the Christ child with love and humility before such a great gift from on high. In anticipation, let me already wish you and your families a holy and peaceful Christmas!”

Letter #39: A Christmas Pardon

December 23, 2012, Sunday — An Act of Grace for Christmas

Pope Benedict has taken a “pre-Christmas decision” to grant his former butler, who stole papers from his desk and was for this sentenced to 18 months in prison, a full pardon. Paolo Gabriele will now be able to spend Christmas with his wife and three small children.

Pope Benedict pardons former butler Paolo Gabriele

Pope Benedict XVI yesterday, just three days before Christmas, pardoned his former butler, Paolo Gabriele, who was serving an 18-month jail sentence for stealing confidential Vatican documents and handing them over to a journalist for publication, resulting in the “Vatileaks” scandal.

This photo from the Osservatore Romano, is the only photo of the meeting the Vatican will be releasing.

This photo from the Osservatore Romano, is the only photo of the meeting the Vatican will be releasing.

The Pope yesterday morning visited Gabriele personally in his Vatican cell to inform him of the decision, the Vatican said in a statement. The Vatican’s spokesman, Father Federico Lombardi, said the two had a “very intense” conversation for about 15 minutes, privately and alone.

On October 6, a Vatican tribunal, after a brief trial, found Gabriele guilty of removing and/or photocopying dozens of the Pope’s private documents and leaking them to Italian journalist Gianluigi Nuzzi, who published them in May.

Gabriele said in his testimony that he acted out of love for the Church. He said he had taken the documents in order to “jar” the Vatican in some way, in order to force top officials — and eventually the Pope himself — to face more directly a number of cases where special agendas seemed to be placing private or partial interests ahead of the interests of the Universal Church. In this sense, Gabriele saw himself as a “whistleblower,” not as the agent of any group, in or out of the Church, seeking to harm the Church. The Vatican tribunal judges said in their sentence that they believed Gabriele’s description of his motivation, and for this reason reduced his sentence from 3 years to a year and a half.

Now Gabriele is free.

“This morning the Holy Father Benedict XVI visited Paolo Gabriele in prison in order to confirm his forgiveness and to inform him personally of his acceptance of Mr Gabriele’s request for pardon,” the Vatican statement said.

In November the court convicted a computer expert, Claudio Sciarpelletti, of helping Gabriele leak the papal documents. Sciarpelletti, who pleaded innocent, was found guilty and given a suspended sentence of two months. He is already back at work in his old job, and a full pardon is also expected soon for him, Father Lombardi said.

What has not been made clear is whether the “Vatileaks” case is now completely closed, or not.

A few days ago, Pope Benedict, unexpectedly, received in audience three cardinals — the Spaniard Julian Herranz, the Slovak Josef Tomko and the Italian Salvatore De Giorgi — who comprise the special “cardinals’ commission” the Pope himself set up to investigate the “Vatileaks” case, alongside the investigation of the Vatican court and the Vatican police department.

It is said in Rome that the three cardinals continued to gather testimony and evidence about the case even after Gabriele’s trial and sentencing in October. This suggests that perhaps there is still an ongoing investigation. But what this investigation (if it is continuing) consists of, why it might be continuing, and what it might lead to (if anything), is not clear.

The Text of the Vatican Communique

Here is the text of the Vatican communique from yesterday, first in Italian, then in English translation:

COMUNICATO DELLA SEGRETERIA DI STATO, 22.12.2012

Questa mattina il Santo Padre Benedetto XVI ha fatto visita in carcere al Sig. Paolo Gabriele, per confermargli il proprio perdono e per comunicargli di persona di avere accolto la sua domanda di grazia, condonando la pena a lui inflitta. Si è trattato di un gesto paterno verso una persona con cui il Papa ha condiviso per alcuni anni una quotidiana familiarità.

Successivamente, il Sig. Gabriele è stato scarcerato ed è rientrato a casa. Benché non possa riprendere il precedente lavoro e continuare a risiedere in Vaticano, la Santa Sede, confidando nella sincerità del ravvedimento manifestato, intende offrirgli la possibilità di riprendere con serenità la vita insieme alla sua famiglia.

Bollettino Ufficiale Santa Sede

“This morning the Holy Father Benedict XVI visited Paolo Gabriele in prison in order to confirm his forgiveness and communicate in person his decision to grant Mr Gabriele’s request for pardon, thereby remitting the sentence passed against the latter. This constitutes a paternal gesture towards a person with whom the Pope shared a relationship of daily familiarity for many years.

“Mr Gabriele was subsequently released from prison and has returned home. Since he cannot resume his previous occupation or continue to live in Vatican City, the Holy See, trusting in his sincere repentance, wishes to offer him the possibility of returning to a serene family life.”

Official Holy See Bulletin

=======================

The butler’s future

“Although he (Paolo Gabriele) cannot continue his prior work or continue to live inside Vatican City, the Holy See, trusting in the sincerity of his apparent repentance, intends to offer him the possibility of taking up again with serenity his life together with his family,” Father Lombardi said.

Lombardi indicated that the Vatican will find Gabriele a different job outside of Vatican City, and a different residence, also outside of the city.

And so ends the “Vatileaks” case — with a gesture of forgiveness from the Pope, and the return of a father to his family, just in time for Christmas.

Letter #38: The Pope to the Roman Curia

 

December 21, 2012, Friday — The Pope’s Christmas Message to the Roman Curia

Today in Rome the Pope delivered an address containing paragraphs among the most important of his pontificate. For those wishing to defend the traditional family, these paragraphs are a “must read.” He also develops a theory of religious dialogue which seems to be a slight but still significant “development” of the theory of religious dialogue that has held sway since the Council…

Pope Benedict today stated flatly that the modern theory that we can create our own gender identity ourselves, freely, is “profoundly false.”

And he explained why, citing approvingly the leading Jewish rabbi of France.

In this talk, therefore, we have a clear papal statement on the “gender revolution,” a clear rejection of the major arguments of the “gender revolutionaries,” and a hint of a sort of nascent “pragmatic alliance” between Catholics and Jews on the matter of defense of the traditional family.

We also have here the hint of a call for political action to defend traditional values. The Pope says: “The values that she (the Church) recognizes as fundamental and non-negotiable for the human condition she must propose with all clarity. She must do all she can to convince, and this can then stimulate political action.”

Finally, in a discussion about religious dialogue — which the Pope sees as critical to world peace — the Pope made an argument which may be seen as controversial in the current climate.

He observes that, in entering into a sincere dialogue with non-Christians, Christians do not seek directly the immediate “conversion” of those with whom they speak. However, he adds — and this is significant — the end result of being in a dialogue is naturally for all participants to draw closer to the truth. This could lead the partner to wish to embrace the truth found in Christianity.

Benedict makes this point with extreme delicacy: “Thus this search can also mean taking common steps towards the one truth, even if the fundamental choices remain unaltered. If both sides set out from a hermeneutic of justice and peace, the fundamental difference will not disappear, but a deeper closeness will emerge nevertheless.”

It would be wrong to exaggerate this point, but it would also be wrong to overlook it entirely. Benedict seems here to be developing an argument, or at least the beginning of an argument, in support of the hope of a type of “conversion” of the dialogue partner, in a religious dialogue that still does not, in any explicit way, have that as its stated goal.

Finally, Benedict in these lines issues a dramatic call to Christians to engage in dialogue fearlessly, saying they should enter into dialogue on all issues without worrying that their Christian identity might be shaken. “I would say that the Christian can afford to be supremely confident, yes, fundamentally certain that he can venture freely into the open sea of the truth, without having to fear for his Christian identity,” Benedict says.

These are powerful, dramatic words, well worth reading and contemplating. All in all, it is a remarkable text. (Full text published below.)

The Pope concludes by wishing all in the Roman Curia a blessed Christmas and a happy New Year.

==============

Note: Please consider a gift subscription to Inside the Vatican – a gift that “keeps on giving”… To order, send an email to us with your name and address, and we will bill you, or call 1-800-789-9494 in the US. Right now through Christmas: 1 subscription for $30, 2 for $50, and 3 for $65. Fairly economical Christmas gifts!

================

ADDRESS OF HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XVI
ON THE OCCASION OF CHRISTMAS GREETINGS
TO THE ROMAN CURIA

Clementine Hall
Friday, 21 December 2012

Dear Cardinals,
Brother Bishops and Priests,
Dear Brothers and Sisters,

It is with great joy that I meet you today, dear Members of the College of Cardinals, Representatives of the Roman Curia and the Governorate, for this traditional event in the days leading up to the feast of Christmas. I greet each one of you cordially, beginning with Cardinal Angelo Sodano, whom I thank for his kind words and for the warm good wishes that he extended to me on behalf of all present. The Dean of the College of Cardinals reminded us of an expression that appears frequently during these days in the Latin liturgy: Prope est iam Dominus, venite, adoremus! ”The Lord is already near, come, let us adore him!”

We too, as one family, prepare ourselves to adore the Child in the stable at Bethlehem who is God himself and has come so close as to become a man like us. I willingly reciprocate your good wishes and I thank all of you from my heart, including the Papal Representatives all over the world, for the generous and competent assistance that each of you offers me in my ministry.

Recalling the Past Year

Once again we find ourselves at the end of a year that has seen all kinds of difficult situations, important questions and challenges, but also signs of hope, both in the Church and in the world. I shall mention just a few key elements regarding the life of the Church and my Petrine ministry.

First of all, as the Dean of the College of Cardinals mentioned, there were the journeys to Mexico and Cuba – unforgettable encounters with the power of faith, so deeply rooted in human hearts, and with the joie de vivre that issues from faith.

I recall how, on my arrival in Mexico, there were endless crowds of people lining the long route, cheering and waving flags and handkerchiefs.

I recall how, on the journey to the attractive provincial capital Guanajuato, there were young people respectfully kneeling by the side of the road to receive the blessing of Peter’s Successor.

I recall how the great liturgy beside the statue of Christ the King made Christ’s kingship present among us – his peace, his justice, his truth.

All this took place against the backdrop of the country’s problems, afflicted as it is by many different forms of violence and the hardships of economic dependence. While these problems cannot be solved simply by religious fervour, neither can they be solved without the inner purification of hearts that issues from the power of faith, from the encounter with Jesus Christ.

“And then there was Cuba…”

And then there was Cuba – here too there were great liturgical celebrations, in which the singing, the praying and the silence made tangibly present the One that the country’s authorities had tried for so long to exclude.

That country’s search for a proper balancing of the relationship between obligations and freedom cannot succeed without reference to the basic criteria that mankind has discovered through encounter with the God of Jesus Christ.

Milan, Lebanon, the Synod…

As further key moments in the course of the year, I should like to single out the great Meeting of Families in Milan and the visit to Lebanon, where I consigned the Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation that is intended to offer signposts for the life of churches and society in the Middle East along the difficult paths of unity and peace. The last major event of the year was the Synod on the New Evangelization, which also served as a collective inauguration of the Year of Faith, in which we commemorate the opening of the Second Vatican Council fifty years ago, seeking to understand it anew and appropriate it anew in the changed circumstances of today.

 

The family, religious dialogue, and the new evangelization…

All these occasions spoke to fundamental themes of this moment in history: the family (Milan), serving peace in the world and dialogue among religions (Lebanon) and proclaiming the message of Jesus Christ in our day to those who have yet to encounter him and to the many who know him only externally and hence do not actually recognize him. Among these broad themes, I should like to focus particularly on the theme of the family and the nature of dialogue, and then to add a brief observation on the question of the new evangelization.

The crisis threatening the family and the new theory of gender

The great joy with which families from all over the world congregated in Milan indicates that, despite all impressions to the contrary, the family is still strong and vibrant today.

But there is no denying the crisis that threatens it to its foundations – especially in the western world.

It was noticeable that the Synod repeatedly emphasized the significance, for the transmission of the faith, of the family as the authentic setting in which to hand on the blueprint of human existence. This is something we learn by living it with others and suffering it with others.

So it became clear that the question of the family is not just about a particular social construct, but about man himself – about what he is and what it takes to be authentically human.

The challenges involved are manifold.

First of all there is the question of the human capacity to make a commitment or to avoid commitment. Can one bind oneself for a lifetime? Does this correspond to man’s nature? Does it not contradict his freedom and the scope of his self-realization? Does man become himself by living for himself alone and only entering into relationships with others when he can break them off again at any time? Is lifelong commitment antithetical to freedom? Is commitment also worth suffering for?

Man’s refusal to make any commitment – which is becoming increasingly widespread as a result of a false understanding of freedom and self-realization as well as the desire to escape suffering – means that man remains closed in on himself and keeps his “I” ultimately for himself, without really rising above it. Yet only in self-giving does man find himself, and only by opening himself to the other, to others, to children, to the family, only by letting himself be changed through suffering, does he discover the breadth of his humanity. When such commitment is repudiated, the key figures of human existence likewise vanish: father, mother, child – essential elements of the experience of being human are lost.

The Pope Cites, with Approval, the Chief Rabbi of France

The Chief Rabbi of France, Gilles Bernheim, has shown in a very detailed and profoundly moving study that the attack we are currently experiencing on the true structure of the family, made up of father, mother, and child, goes much deeper.

While up to now we regarded a false understanding of the nature of human freedom as one cause of the crisis of the family, it is now becoming clear that the very notion of being – of what being human really means – is being called into question. He quotes the famous saying of Simone de Beauvoir: “one is not born a woman, one becomes so” (on ne naît pas femme, on le devient).

These words lay the foundation for what is put forward today under the term “gender” as a new philosophy of sexuality. According to this philosophy, sex is no longer a given element of nature, that man has to accept and personally make sense of: it is a social role that we choose for ourselves, while in the past it was chosen for us by society.

The profound falsehood of this theory and of the anthropological revolution contained within it is obvious.

Human nature and sexual identity

People dispute the idea that they have a nature, given by their bodily identity, that serves as a defining element of the human being.

They deny their nature and decide that it is not something previously given to them, but that they make it for themselves.

According to the biblical creation account, being created by God as male and female pertains to the essence of the human creature. This duality is an essential aspect of what being human is all about, as ordained by God. This very duality as something previously given is what is now disputed. The words of the creation account: “male and female he created them” (Gen 1:27) no longer apply.

No, what applies now is this: it was not God who created them male and female – hitherto society did this, now we decide for ourselves. Man and woman as created realities, as the nature of the human being, no longer exist. Man calls his nature into question.

From now on he is merely spirit and will. The manipulation of nature, which we deplore today where our environment is concerned, now becomes man’s fundamental choice where he himself is concerned. From now on there is only the abstract human being, who chooses for himself what his nature is to be. Man and woman in their created state as complementary versions of what it means to be human are disputed.

But if there is no pre-ordained duality of man and woman in creation, then neither is the family any longer a reality established by creation. Likewise, the child has lost the place he had occupied hitherto and the dignity pertaining to him.

Bernheim shows that now, perforce, from being a subject of rights, the child has become an object to which people have a right and which they have a right to obtain. When the freedom to be creative becomes the freedom to create oneself, then necessarily the Maker himself is denied and ultimately man too is stripped of his dignity as a creature of God, as the image of God at the core of his being.

The defence of the family is about man himself. And it becomes clear that when God is denied, human dignity also disappears. Whoever defends God is defending man.

The Question of Dialogue and Proclamation

At this point I would like to address the second major theme, which runs through the whole of the past year from Assisi to the Synod on the New Evangelization: the question of dialogue and proclamation. Let us speak firstly of dialogue. For the Church in our day I see three principal areas of dialogue, in which she must be present in the struggle for man and his humanity: dialogue with states, dialogue with society – which includes dialogue with cultures and with science – and finally dialogue with religions. In all these dialogues the Church speaks on the basis of the light given her by faith.

But at the same time she incorporates the memory of mankind, which is a memory of man’s experiences and sufferings from the beginnings and down the centuries, in which she has learned about the human condition, she has experienced its boundaries and its grandeur, its opportunities and its limitations.

Human culture, of which she is a guarantee, has developed from the encounter between divine revelation and human existence.

The Church represents the memory of what it means to be human in the face of a civilization of forgetfulness, which knows only itself and its own criteria. Yet just as an individual without memory has lost his identity, so too a human race without memory would lose its identity.

What the Church has learned from the encounter between revelation and human experience does indeed extend beyond the realm of pure reason, but it is not a separate world that has nothing to say to unbelievers. By entering into the thinking and understanding of mankind, this knowledge broadens the horizon of reason and thus it speaks also to those who are unable to share the faith of the Church.

In her dialogue with the state and with society, the Church does not, of course, have ready answers for individual questions. Along with other forces in society, she will wrestle for the answers that best correspond to the truth of the human condition. The values that she recognizes as fundamental and non-negotiable for the human condition she must propose with all clarity. She must do all she can to convince, and this can then stimulate political action.

Dialogue a necessary condition for peace

In man’s present situation, the dialogue of religions is a necessary condition for peace in the world and it is therefore a duty for Christians as well as other religious communities. This dialogue of religions has various dimensions.

In the first place it is simply a dialogue of life, a dialogue of being together.

This will not involve discussing the great themes of faith – whether God is Trinitarian or how the inspiration of the sacred Scriptures is to be understood, and so on. It is about the concrete problems of coexistence and shared responsibility for society, for the state, for humanity.

In the process, it is necessary to learn to accept the other in his otherness and the otherness of his thinking. To this end, the shared responsibility for justice and peace must become the guiding principle of the conversation.

A dialogue about peace and justice is bound to move beyond the purely pragmatic to become an ethical struggle for the truth and for the human being: a dialogue concerning the values that come before everything.

In this way what began as a purely practical dialogue becomes a quest for the right way to live as a human being. Even if the fundamental choices themselves are not under discussion, the search for an answer to a specific question becomes a process in which, through listening to the other, both sides can obtain purification and enrichment.

Thus this search can also mean taking common steps towards the one truth, even if the fundamental choices remain unaltered. If both sides set out from a hermeneutic of justice and peace, the fundamental difference will not disappear, but a deeper closeness will emerge nevertheless.

Two rules are generally regarded nowadays as fundamental for interreligious dialogue:

1. Dialogue does not aim at conversion, but at understanding. In this respect it differs from evangelization, from mission;

2. Accordingly, both parties to the dialogue remain consciously within their identity, which the dialogue does not place in question either for themselves or for the other.

These rules are correct, but in the way they are formulated here I still find them too superficial.

True, dialogue does not aim at conversion, but at better mutual understanding – that is correct. But all the same, the search for knowledge and understanding always has to involve drawing closer to the truth.

Both sides in this piece-by-piece approach to truth are therefore on the path that leads forward and towards greater commonality, brought about by the oneness of the truth. As far as preserving identity is concerned, it would be too little for the Christian, so to speak, to assert his identity in a such a way that he effectively blocks the path to truth. Then his Christianity would appear as something arbitrary, merely propositional. He would seem not to reckon with the possibility that religion has to do with truth.

On the contrary, I would say that the Christian can afford to be supremely confident, yes, fundamentally certain that he can venture freely into the open sea of the truth, without having to fear for his Christian identity.

To be sure, we do not possess the truth, the truth possesses us: Christ, who is the truth, has taken us by the hand, and we know that his hand is holding us securely on the path of our quest for knowledge. Being inwardly held by the hand of Christ makes us free and keeps us safe: free – because if we are held by him, we can enter openly and fearlessly into any dialogue; safe – because he does not let go of us, unless we cut ourselves off from him. At one with him, we stand in the light of truth.

A brief word on proclamation

Finally, at least a brief word should be added on the subject of proclamation, or evangelization, on which the post-synodal document will speak in depth, on the basis of the Synod Fathers’ propositions. I find that the essential elements of the process of evangelizing appear most eloquently in St. John’s account of the calling of two of John the Baptist’s disciples, who become disciples of Jesus Christ (1:35-39). First of all, we have the simple act of proclamation. John the Baptist points towards Jesus and says: “Behold the Lamb of God!”

A similar act is recounted a few verses later. This time it is Andrew, who says to his brother Simon “We have found the Messiah” (1:41).

The first and fundamental element is the straightforward proclamation, the kerygma, which draws its strength from the inner conviction of the one proclaiming.

In the account of the two disciples, the next stage is that of listening and following behind Jesus, which is not yet discipleship, but rather a holy curiosity, a movement of seeking. Both of them, after all, are seekers, men who live over and above everyday affairs in the expectation of God – in the expectation that he exists and will reveal himself. Stimulated by the proclamation, their seeking becomes concrete. They want to come to know better the man described as the Lamb of God by John the Baptist.

The third act is set in motion when Jesus turns round, approaches them and asks: “What do you seek?” They respond with a further question, which demonstrates the openness of their expectation, their readiness to take new steps. They ask: “Rabbi, where are you staying?” Jesus’ answer “Come and see!” is an invitation to walk with him and thereby to have their eyes opened with him.

The word of proclamation is effective in situations where man is listening in readiness for God to draw near, where man is inwardly searching and thus on the way towards the Lord. His heart is touched when Jesus turns towards him, and then his encounter with the proclamation becomes a holy curiosity to come to know Jesus better. As he walks with Jesus, he is led to the place where Jesus lives, to the community of the Church, which is his body.

That means entering into the journeying community of catechumens, a community of both learning and living, in which our eyes are opened as we walk.

“Come and see!” This saying, addressed by Jesus to the two seeker-disciples, he also addresses to the seekers of today.

At the end of the year, we pray to the Lord that the Church, despite all her shortcomings, may be increasingly recognizable as his dwelling-place. We ask him to open our eyes ever wider as we make our way to his house, so that we can say ever more clearly, ever more convincingly: “we have found him for whom the whole world is waiting, Jesus Christ, the true Son of God and true man”.

With these sentiments, I wish you all from my heart a blessed Christmas and a happy New Year. Thank you.

Letter #37: Pope in “Financial Times”: “No bowing to false gods”

December 21, 2012, Friday — The Pope Publishes an Unprecedented Christmas Comment in the December 20 “Financial Times” of London
A Pope in the pages of an ordinary newspaper? As a columnist? Never happened before. But it happened yesterday. Pope Benedict was asked by theFinancial Times of London to write a brief essay for them related to his new book on Jesus, and he agreed. His essential message to London and the world: do not “bow down to false gods” of money and power but remember the true nobility of man and his eternal destiny. Here is the complete text of what the Pope said…
 
Benedict to the City of London: “Christians refuse to bow down before the false gods proposed today”
Benedict XVI has done it again: he has broken with past tradition by publishing an article in an ordinary newspaper, something no Pope before him has ever done.
Clearly, Benedict is willing to choose almost any means to reach out to everyone, in and out of the Church, with the message of the Gospel (as he also showed by launching his unprecedented “Twitter” account @pontifex on December 12, from which he is now sending “tweets” to those who have signed up to “follow” him, now numbering more than 2 million people).
What was his essential message in this extraordinary Christmas essay, which must have been conceived as something that would “hit home” to a very special audience: the financial and business “elite” of London, and, by extension, of the whole modern financial world?
Benedict’s message was simple: that the success and wealth and power of this world — money and capital and stocks and metals and derivatives — cannot ultimately satisfy men and women, who are actually made for something far higher, for communion with an eternal, infinite, personal God, who made (and continues to make) Himself known at Christmas.
It was a message especially tailored for those who “have everything” — or, perhaps, think they will soon have it…
A message aimed at provoking a reflection on whether they really do have what they, in the end, desire, even if they achieve (as Simon and Garfunkel put it in the song about the wealthy but unhappy Richard Cory) “power, grace and style.”
The Financial Times of December 20, regarded by many as the Number 1 financial paper of Europe, promoted the Pope’s piece on the front page, calling it “A Christmas lesson in times of austerity.”
There are some very powerful lines in Benedict’s essay. Lines filled with nobility. Lines which, if those who read his words — even CEOs and hedge fund managers — have ears to hear, may cause some to say, “Yes, this is what I believe in my heart to be true.”
Benedict laid things out with almost blinding clarity, very simply, very understandably.
Christians, he said, both under the Roman Emperors and in our own day, refuse to bow down to all “false gods.”
But why such stubbornness?
Because Christians have a vision they do not want to betray, indeed, feel they cannot betray, without risking losing their very selves, their souls, because they are “inspired by such a noble vision of human destiny that they cannot collude with anything that undermines it.”
And any other vision, any other proposal for mankind’s destiny seems so much less noble, so pointless, that to accept that alternative vision, to bow down to it, to live by its demands, seems ignoble, seems miserable, seems enslaving, seems, in a word, sad. And Christians seek happiness, blessedness, and so refuse to accept a stance toward reality, such a “bowing down” to gods or ideologies leading finally, to sadness.
Here is the key passage (italicized in the full text printed below):
“When Christians refuse to bow down before the false gods proposed today, it is not because of an antiquated world-view. Rather, it is because they are free from the constraints of ideology and inspired by such a noble vision of human destiny that they cannot collude with anything that undermines it.”
These words are worth repeating: “Christians refuse to bow down before the false gods proposed today… because they are free…”
It cannot be stressed too much: this Pope is a lover and defender of human freedom.
He preaches, in fact, a profound form of “freedom theology” (it could also be called “liberation theology”).
Again: “Christians refuse to bow down before the false gods… because they are free from the contraints of ideology…”
What is an ideology? Why does an ideology create “constraints”? Why does an ideology diminish freedom, that is, bit by bit, enslave?
An ideology is “a set of ideas that constitute one’s goals, expectations, and actions” and “a comprehensive vision, a way of looking at things.” (Words like “communism,” “capitalism” and “socialism,” all are the names for ideologies, for a set of ideas that become a “comprehensive vision.”)
The key point is that an ideology is made up of ideas, thoughts.
This means an ideology is not, and cannot be, a living person.
And so an ideology cannot be loved as a person can be loved.
Ideas, thoughts, are inanimate things. They are “things thought” by persons who have the capability of thinking.
Thus an ideology can be like a “matrix” of thoughts, notions and slogans that descends on the mind, and on the heart, and persuades the person — the mind, the heart — to act in accord with it.
And so an ideological person, for “ideological” reasons, can run over another person, can be cruel to another person, can oppress another person, can despise or hate another person, without ever meeting or knowing that person at all.
The “ideology” determines behavior — not the meeting and knowing of an actual person.
And so Christianity, based completely on one person (and not on any ideology) can never fully embrace any ideology, but must always return to the deep source of personhood, to the logos… to Christ himself.
And, by returning to Christ, by being in communion with the person of Christ, nourished by the person of Christ, all ideology is relativized — all “false gods” (money, power, fame) are relativized.
And, for a god, to be relativized is, in the end, to be rejected.
To be overthrown.
And so the Pope — speaking to the “masters of the universe” in London and elsewhere (to use Tom Wolfe’s half-serious, half-mocking phrase in reference to the great “movers and shakers” of Wall Street in his 1987 novel The Bonfire of the Vanities) explained why Christians throughout history have been unable to comply with “demands made by Caesar” (the greatest “mover and shaker” of any epoch).

Benedict said: “From the Emperor cult of ancient Rome to the totalitarian regimes of the last century [i.e., Communism, National Socialism, Fascism], Caesar has tried to take the place of God.” And precisely here is where Benedict adds his signature phrase: “When Christians refuse to bow down before the false gods proposed today, it is not because of an antiquated worldview. Rather, it is because they are free from the constraints of ideology and inspired by such a noble vision of human destiny that they cannot collude with anything that undermines it.”

And so the Pope is making quite clear that no ideology, no Caesar, no old or new proposal of global order or government, can be embraced by Christians,can be “colluded” with.
Such “false gods” undermine the ultimate destiny of man (to become like Christ, to take on the divinity of Christ as he took on our humanity in Bethlehem, that is, to become divine).
The birth of Christ, the Pope says, “challenges us to reassess our priorities, our values, our very way of life.”
He added: “While Christmas is undoubtedly a time of great joy, it is also an occasion for deep reflection, even an examination of conscience. At the end of a year that has meant economic hardship for many, what can we learn from the humility, the poverty, the simplicity of the crib scene?”
A possible, partial answer: we can learn that God not only loves the poor, but that He Himself was poor. Yes, he was among the poor, but not only that! He actually was poor.
There was no room for Him at the inn… He was born in a stable… And so it is not so much amid great wealth and power, but in true humility and in actual poverty, that one may find Christ.

The Financial Times asked the Pope to write the reflection, and he agreed. As far as anyone in Rome knows, it is the first time ever that a Pope has written an article for a secular newspaper.

However, it is not the first time the Pope has accepted requests to appear in a secular media setting. He once appeared on the British network, BBC, three months after hios visit to Scotland and England in September 2010, and once agreed to respond to children’s questions on the Italian national network, RAI.

On the Financial Times website, the Pope’s article is only accessible to subscribers. But the Vatican Press Office handed out the complete text, both in its English original, and in an Italian translation.
Here, as  kind of early Christmas gift, is the Pope’s complete essay on Christmas.
ARTICLE BY THE HOLY FATHER BENEDICT XVI
IN THE FINANCIAL TIMES
“A TIME FOR CHRISTIANS TO ENGAGE WITH THE WORLD”

(Introductory note from the Vatican Press Office)
The Pope’s article for the Financial Times (December 20, 2012) originates from a request from the editorial office of the Financial Times itself which, taking as a cue the recent publication of the Pope’s book on Jesus’ infancy, asked for his comments on the occasion of Christmas.
Despite the unusual nature of the request, the Holy Father accepted willingly.
It is perhaps appropriate to recall the Pope’s willingness to respond to other unusual requests in the past, such as the interview given for the BBC, again at Christmas a few months after his visit to the United Kingdom, or the television interview for the program “A sua imagine” produced by the RAI, the Italian state broadcasting company, to mark the occasion of Good Friday. These too have been opportunities to speak about Jesus Christ and to bring his message to a wide forum at salient moments during the Christian liturgical year.
(Here begins the title and text of the Pope’s article as it appeared.)
A Time for Christians to Engage with the World

“Render unto Caesar what belongs to Caesar and to God what belongs to God,” was the response of Jesus when asked about paying taxes.

His questioners, of course, were laying a trap for him. They wanted to force him to take sides in the highly-charged political debate about Roman rule in the land of Israel.
Yet there was more at stake here: if Jesus really was the long-awaited Messiah, then surely he would oppose the Roman overlords. So the question was calculated to expose him either as a threat to the regime, or a fraud.

Jesus’ answer deftly moves the argument to a higher plane, gently cautioning against both the politicization of religion and the deification of temporal power, along with the relentless pursuit of wealth.

His audience needed to be reminded that the Messiah was not Caesar, and Caesar was not God. The kingdom that Jesus came to establish was of an altogether higher order. As he told Pontius Pilate, “My kingship is not of this world.”

The Christmas stories in the New Testament are intended to convey a similar message.

Jesus was born during a “census of the whole world” taken by Caesar Augustus, the Emperor renowned for bringing the Pax Romana to all the lands under Roman rule. Yet this infant, born in an obscure and far-flung corner of the Empire, was to offer the world a far greater peace, truly universal in scope and transcending all limitations of space and time.

Jesus is presented to us as King David’s heir, but the liberation he brought to his people was not about holding hostile armies at bay; it was about conquering sin and death forever.

The birth of Christ challenges us to reassess our priorities, our values, our very way of life. While Christmas is undoubtedly a time of great joy, it is also an occasion for deep reflection, even an examination of conscience. At the end of a year that has meant economic hardship for many, what can we learn from the humility, the poverty, the simplicity of the crib scene?

Christmas can be the time in which we learn to read the Gospel, to get to know Jesus not only as the Child in the manger, but as the one in whom we recognize God made Man.

It is in the Gospel that Christians find inspiration for their daily lives and their involvement in worldly affairs – be it in the Houses of Parliament or the Stock Exchange.

Christians shouldn’t shun the world; they should engage with it. But their involvement in politics and economics should transcend every form of ideology.

Christians fight poverty out of a recognition of the supreme dignity of every human being, created in God’s image and destined for eternal life.

Christians work for more equitable sharing of the earth’s resources out of a belief that, as stewards of God’s creation, we have a duty to care for the weakest and most vulnerable.
Christians oppose greed and exploitation out of a conviction that generosity and selfless love, as taught and lived by Jesus of Nazareth, are the way that leads to fullness of life.
Christian belief in the transcendent destiny of every human being gives urgency to the task of promoting peace and justice for all.

Because these goals are shared by so many, much fruitful cooperation is possible between Christians and others. Yet Christians render to Caesar only what belongs to Caesar, not what belongs to God.

Christians have at times throughout history been unable to comply with demands made by Caesar. From the Emperor cult of ancient Rome to the totalitarian regimes of the last century, Caesar has tried to take the place of God.
When Christians refuse to bow down before the false gods proposed today, it is not because of an antiquated world-view. Rather, it is because they are free from the constraints of ideology and inspired by such a noble vision of human destiny that they cannot collude with anything that undermines it.

In Italy, many crib scenes feature the ruins of ancient Roman buildings in the background. This shows that the birth of the child Jesus marks the end of the old order, the pagan world, in which Caesar’s claims went virtually unchallenged.

Now there is a new king, who relies not on the force of arms, but on the power of love.
He brings hope to all those who, like himself, live on the margins of society.
He brings hope to all who are vulnerable to the changing fortunes of a precarious world.
From the manger, Christ calls us to live as citizens of his heavenly kingdom, a kingdom that all people of good will can help to build here on earth.

Italian Translation

“Rendi a Cesare ciò che è di Cesare e a Dio ciò che è di Dio” fu la risposta di Gesù quando gli fu chiesto ciò che pensava sul pagamento delle tasse. Quelli che lo interrogavano, ovviamente, volevano tendergli una trappola. Volevano costringerlo a prendere posizione nel dibattito politico infuocato sulla dominazione romana nella terra di Israele. E tuttavia c’era in gioco ancora di più: se Gesù era realmente il Messia atteso, allora sicuramente si sarebbe opposto ai dominatori romani. Pertanto la domanda era calcolata per smascherarlo o come una minaccia per il regime o come un impostore.

La risposta di Gesù porta abilmente la questione ad un livello superiore, mettendo con finezza in guardia nei confronti sia della politicizzazione della religione sia della deificazione del potere temporale, come pure dell’instancabile ricerca della ricchezza. I suoi ascoltatori dovevano capire che il Messia non era Cesare, e che Cesare non era Dio. Il regno che Gesù veniva ad instaurare era di una dimensione assolutamente superiore. Come rispose a Ponzio Pilato: “Il mio regno non è di questo mondo”.

I racconti di Natale del Nuovo Testamento hanno lo scopo di esprimere un messaggio simile. Gesù nacque durante un “censimento del mondo intero”, voluto da Cesare Augusto, l’imperatore famoso per aver portato la Pax Romana in tutte le terre sottoposte al dominio romano. Eppure questo bambino, nato in un oscuro e distante angolo dell’impero, stava per offrire al mondo una pace molto più grande, veramente universale nei suoi scopi e trascendente ogni limite di spazio e di tempo.

Gesù ci viene presentato come erede del re Davide, ma la liberazione che egli portò alla propria gente non riguardava il tenere a bada eserciti nemici; si trattava, invece, di vincere per sempre il peccato e la morte.

La nascita di Cristo ci sfida a ripensare le nostre priorità, i nostri valori, il nostro stesso modo di vivere. E mentre il Natale è senza dubbio un tempo di gioia grande, è anche un’occasione di profonda riflessione, anzi un esame di coscienza. Alla fine di un anno che ha significato privazioni economiche per molti, che cosa possiamo apprendere dall’umiltà, dalla povertà, dalla semplicità della scena del presepe?

Il Natale può essere il tempo nel quale impariamo a leggere il Vangelo, a conoscere Gesù non soltanto come il Bimbo della mangiatoia, ma come colui nel quale riconosciamo il Dio fatto Uomo.

E’ nel Vangelo che i cristiani trovano ispirazione per la vita quotidiana e per il loro coinvolgimento negli affari del mondo – sia che ciò avvenga nel Parlamento o nella Borsa. I cristiani non dovrebbero sfuggire il mondo; al contrario, dovrebbero impegnarsi in esso. Ma il loro coinvolgimento nella politica e nell’economia dovrebbe trascendere ogni forma di ideologia.

I cristiani combattono la povertà perché riconoscono la dignità suprema di ogni essere umano, creato a immagine di Dio e destinato alla vita eterna. I cristiani operano per una condivisione equa delle risorse della terra perché sono convinti che, quali amministratori della creazione di Dio, noi abbiamo il dovere di prendersi cura dei più deboli e dei più vulnerabili. I cristiani si oppongono all’avidità e allo sfruttamento nel convincimento che la generosità e un amore dimentico di sé, insegnati e vissuti da Gesù di Nazareth, sono la via che conduce alla pienezza della vita. La fede cristiana nel destino trascendente di ogni essere umano implica l’urgenza del compito di promuovere la pace e la giustizia per tutti.

Poiché tali fini vengono condivisi da molti, è possibile una grande e fruttuosa collaborazione fra i cristiani e gli altri. E tuttavia i cristiani danno a Cesare soltanto quello che è di Cesare, ma non ciò che appartiene a Dio. Talvolta lungo la storia i cristiani non hanno potuto accondiscendere alle richieste fatte da Cesare. Dal culto dell’imperatore dell’antica Roma ai regimi totalitari del secolo appena trascorso, Cesare ha cercato di prendere il posto di Dio. Quando i cristiani rifiutano di inchinarsi davanti ai falsi dèi proposti nei nostri tempi non è perché hanno una visione antiquata del mondo. Al contrario, ciò avviene perché sono liberi dai legami dell’ideologia e animati da una visione così nobile del destino umano, che non possono accettare compromessi con nulla che lo possa insidiare.

In Italia, molte scene di presepi sono adornate di rovine degli antichi edifici romani sullo sfondo. Ciò dimostra che la nascita del bambino Gesù segna la fine dell’antico ordine, il mondo pagano, nel quale le rivendicazioni di Cesare apparivano impossibili da sfidare. Adesso vi è un nuovo re, il quale non confida nella forza delle armi, ma nella potenza dell’amore. Egli porta speranza a tutti coloro che, come lui stesso, vivono ai margini della società. Porta speranza a quanti sono vulnerabili nelle mutevoli fortune di un mondo precario. Dalla mangiatoia, Cristo ci chiama a vivere da cittadini del suo regno celeste, un regno che ogni persona di buona volontà può aiutare a costruire qui sulla terra.

===========================
Pilgrimages
If you would like to go with us at Inside the Vatican on a pilgrimage to Italy, please click on the link below to contact us.

Letter #36: Canonizing the Council?

December 17, 2012, Monday — The Cause of Paul VI Proceeds… But What of Pius XII?
A week ago, the Vatican Congregation for the Causes of Saints voted in favor of Pope Paul VI’s “heroic virtue.” This clears the way for Paul’s beatification (though a miracle still must be approved). Paul’s beatification could occur during 2013, perhaps at the end of the “Year of Faith.” Still, the “elephant on the room” — the long-delayed cause of Pope Pius XII — remains. Why is Pope Paul’s cause apparently proceeding more quickly than that of Pope Pius, declared “Venerable” in 2009? Some say there is a desire in the Curia to “canonize” the Council, which Paul VI presided over from 1963-1965. Still, some think Benedict could take the opportunity of Paul’s beatification to beatify Pius XII alongside him — the “Pope of the Council” and “the Pope most cited in the Council’s 16 documents”…
“Cardinals vote unanimously in favour of Paul VI’s canonization”
The cardinals and bishops of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints gave the “go ahead” on December 10 for Paul VI’s beatification, Italian Vatican journalist Andrea Tornielli reported on his VaticanInsider website on December 14.
“The late Pope’s Positio – the collection of documents used in the process by which a person is declared a saint – was approved unanimously by all present,” Tornielli reported (the Vatican has not officially released the news). “All bishops and cardinals expressed themselves in favour of the ‘heroic virtues’ of Giovanni Battista Montini, elected Pope with the name Paul VI in 1963 and deceased in 1978. Theologians, who voted separately, also voted unanimously in favor.”
The next move? Pope Benedict will have to sign a “Decree of Heroic Virtues.” This is expected later this week, on Thursday, December 20 (the day the Prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, Cardinal Angelo Amato, will be received by the Pope).
“It is highly likely Benedict XVI will approve the beatification,” Tornielli writes.
Tornielli noted that this decision to declare Paul VI “Venerable” immediately after the vote will be taken (if it is taken, as is expected) much faster than the decision Benedict took in December 2009, after months of delay, to declare Pius XII “Venerable.”
Prior to any beatification, a second step is necessary: the recognition of a miracle, usually an inexplicable healing which occurs through the intercession of the person appealed to in prayer.
Fr. Antonio Marrazzo, the postulator of Paul VI’s cause, believes that an unborn child — an embryo — was healed 16 years ago in California through Paul VI’s intercession.
“During the pregnancy, doctors had found a serious problem with the fetus and because of the effects this problem was known to have on the brain, the only possible solution for the young mother was to have an abortion,” Tornielli writes. “The woman wanted to go through with the pregnancy and entrusted herself to the intercession of Paul VI, the Pope who wrote the 1968 encyclical Humanae Vitae. The child was born without any health impairments.”
A second unexplainable case of healing involving a nun diagnosed with a tumor may also be presented for examination, Tornielli said.Tornielli concludes that Pope Benedict “intends to proceed as quickly as possible” noting that “2013 marks the 50th anniversary of Montini’s election as Pope and the 35th anniversary of his death (in 1978).”
Thus, the beatification of Pope Paul VI is expected in late 2013.
Protests against the decision
Another Vatican journalist, Salvatore Izzo, reporting on December 16 (yesterday) on Tornielli’s article, observes that “the hypothesis of a rapid beatification, however, has prompted the protests of (Catholic) traditionalists, who do not wish to see  the Pope who conducted the Second Vatican Council raised to the altars.”
Izzo noted that the popular Italian traditional Catholic website, Messainlatino, had been “deluged” with “emails of protest.”
“Until the moment when the Holy Father has placed his signature on the decree, we will continue to express very grave reservations regarding such an inopportune decision,” the editors of the Messainlatino.it website write. (The original Italian: “Fino a quando la firma del Sommo Pontefice non sara’ apposta al decreto noi continueremo ad esprimere fortissime riserve in merito a tale inopportuna decisione.”)
They add: “Paul VI, not able to withstand the weight of many pressures also from the Curia… was too indulgent in his desire to please the false friends of the Church (internal and external).” (Original Italian: “Paolo VI, non reggendo il peso di molte pressioni anche della Curia… e indulse troppo nel voler compiacere i falsi amici della Chiesa (interni ed esterni).”)
The editors do not deny “the many gestures and talks of Pope Montini in defense of the Church” (“i molti gesti e discorsi di Papa Montini, a difesa della Chiesa”) but note that he himself “publicly stated that instead of a springtime, the spirit of the Council had provoked a winter, and declared that the smoke of Satan had entered into the Church” (Italian: “accuso’ pubblicamente che invece della primavera, lo spirito del Concilio aveva provocato l’inverno. E denuncio’ che il fumo di Satana era entrato nella Chiesa“).
The website said that, if Benedict XVI does sign the decree for Paul’s heroic virtue and for a miracle, and Paul is then beatified, they will, out of respect for Pope Benedict and his authority, not raise further protests.
And What About Pius XII?
The news that Paul VI may soon be beatified — and then, possibly, canonized as a saint — raised a question in many observers’ minds: What about Pope Pius XII?
In comments following Izzo’s article (found athttp://paparatzinger6blograffaella.blogspot.it/2012/12/il-papa-potrebbe-firmare-giovedi-il.html), one Italian Catholic suggested that it is the world’s Jewish community which opposes Pope Pius’s beatification, and has asked the Vatican not to beatify Pius. “In the case of Pius XII, for the moment, there is the Jewish “nyet,’” this writer wrote. (Italian: “Su Pio XII c’è il niet ebraico, per ora.”) [Note: "Nyet" means "no" in Russian.]
Still, Pope Benedict may actually decide to beatify Pope Pius XII together with Pope Paul VI toward the end of 2013, to close the “Year of Faith.”
“If the Pope who brought the Council to an end and the Pope most cited in the Council documents were beatified together?” another person wrote. “It doesn’t seem to me that unrealistic.” (Italian: “Se il Papa che ha portato a termine il Concilio e il Papa più citato dai documenti conciliari venissero beatificati insieme? Non mi pare così irreale.”
Another wrote that the beatification of Pope Pius XII would be simply “an act of justice toward a JUST MAN who saved many, many lives during the National Socialist extermination!” (Italian: “un atto di giustizia nei confronti di un GIUSTO che tante vite salvò durante lo sterrminio nazista!)
A third writer said that the discussion of the beatification of Paul VI and reaction against the possible decision was ignoring the “elephant in the room,” that is, the long delayed cause of Venerable Pope Pius XII, that is, Pope Eugenio Pacelli (Italian: “l’elefante nella stanza, cioè il caso del sommo pontefice venerabile Pio XII, ovvero Papa Pacelli“).
This person, too, suggested that Benedict may decide to beatify Pius alongside Paul VI later this year, as took place when John XXIII (considered a “progressive”) was beatified alongside Pius IX (considered a “conservative”) on September 3, 2000 (Italian: “si potrebbe realizzare ancora una volta un’accoppiata variegata come quella che fu Giovanni XXIII e Pio IX beati in una volta sola.”)
Finally, a commentator asked whether the beatification of “so many Popes” makes sense. “Did not Pius XI (the Pope before Pius XII) and Benedict XV (the Pope during the First World War) also have merits, or not? Is it not perhaps that there is a desire to canonize the Second Vatican Council and to diminish the pre-conciliar Magisterium?” (Italian: “La beatificazione di tanti papi che senso ha? i precedenti, Pio XI e Benedetto XV, han meriti o demeriti? Non è che si voglia canonizzar il Vaticano II e sminuir il Magistero precedente?“)
So there is considerable interest, and some discontent, in Italian Catholic circles in how Pope Benedict will decide to move forward on Paul VI, and when, and whether Benedict will decide to use Paul as a way to place an exclamation point of approval on the Second Vatican Council, or whether he may decide to place Pius XII beside Paul VI at that moment, thus emphasizing the continuity between the pre-conciliar and conciliar magisterium.

Letter #35: Benedict’s Secretary Promoted

December 7, 2012, Friday — The Pope’s Trust in Monsignor Gänswein
The Vatican on Friday made public the Pope’s decision to make his personal secretary, Monsignor Georg Gänswein, 56, the new Prefect of the Pontifical Household, replacing the American Archbishop (now Cardinal) James Harvey, 63. Monsignor Gänswein will be consecrated an archbishop on January 6. He will also remain the Pope’s personal secretary. The decision reinforces Gänswein’s position as the Pope’s “right hand” 
==============
Note: Please consider taking out a gift subscription to our print magazine,Inside the Vatican, this Christmas. It is a gift that “keeps on giving” all year long… Send an email to us, and we will bill you, or call 1-800-789-9494in the US to order immediately. Right now through Christmas, we have a special offer: 1 subscription for $30, 2 for $50 and 3 for $65.
1 subscription — $30 (for you or a Christmas gift)
2 subscriptions — $50 (perhaps for you and a Christmas gift)
3 subscriptions — $65 (perhaps for you and 2 Christmas gifts)
================
The Pope’s “right hand”
The appointment had been rumored for weeks, but now it has been confirmed.
Pope Benedict — showing his great trust in his personal secretary, Monsignor Georg Gänswein — on Friday appointed Gänswein the new Prefect of the Papal Household.
Gänswein (shown below with Pope Benedict) will replace American Cardinal James Harvey, who had been Prefect for 14 years, since February, 1998, and has just been named the Archpriest of St. Paul’s Outside the Walls, one of the principal basilicas of Rome.
At the same time, Gänswein will continue to be the Pope’s personal secretary.
This appointment is unprecedented in recent Vatican history.
Pope John Paul II did something similar in the late 1990s, naming his personal secretary at that time, Father (now Cardinal Archbishop of Cracow, Poland) Stanislaw Dziwisz, a bishop and, on February 7, 1998, making him at the same time the “adjunct Prefect” of the Papal Household alongside the new Prefect at the time, Harvey.
But Gänswein will not be an “adjunct Prefect,” he will be the actual Prefect.
This means that the Pope is entrusting Gänswein with complete control of the Prefecture of the Papal Household, the office which oversees access to papal audiences, and all meetings with the Pope himself.
One leading Vaticanist, Andrea Tornielli, described on Friday the significance of this decision in this way: “At the beginning of Benedict XVI’s pontificate, very few would have expected Benedict XVI to make such a choice given the criticisms against his predecessor,” Tornielli wrote. “But today’s appointment should be seen in the context of the Vatileaks scandal — the theft and publication of confidential documents from the Pope’s desk. By appointing his secretary an archbishop and giving him a tough task within the Curia’s organizational chart, the Pope has created a protective shield around his collaborator for the future. He has also strengthened him significantly by making him the main interface in Pope-Curia relations and with the outside world.”
There are several little mysteries concealed in this paragraph. What were the criticisms against Benedict’s “predecessor” (Pope John Paul II) when he decided to make Dziwisz the adjunct Prefect? And what is the “protective shield” that the Pope is building around Gänswein? And why is it thought necessary to build such a “shield”?
The criticisms against John Paul’s decision were mainly two: (1) that Dziwisz had been give too much power, and (2) that his exercise of that power was sometimes “idiosyncratic” (“idiosyncratic” means “a structural or behavioral characteristic peculiar to an individual or group”; so, in this case, that Dziwisz had a very personal vision of how to carry out his duties). How so? It was said that Dziwisz’s personal worldview, shaped by his experience in Communist Poland, caused him (as is normal, of course) to look at things from his own, Polish perspective. This caused friction when it did not coincide with the perspective of others in the Roman Curia, and throughout the Universal Church.
Then, what does Tornielli mean by saying that the Pope, in doing this, has created a “protective shield around his collaborator for the future”?
He means, it would seem (and this is a deduction based on simple logic, not on any special knowledge of, or insight into, the situation in the Curia) that Gänswein has critics, even enemies, in the Curia, and in the Church hierarchy. If there were no such critics or enemies, there would be no need for the Pope to think of “protecting” or “shielding” him, as Tornielli says he is doing.
It is said in Rome that Gänswein, in staunchly protecting the time and energy of the Pope — which is, after all, his duty — has irritated many important cardinals and bishops, both in the Curia and around the world.
It is also alleged that this has prevented the Pope from being informed about certain important matters, especially financial and administrative matters — like the cases of corruption alleged by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò (photo), who was then posted to the United States where he is now the nuncio.
However, in keeping Gänswein by his side, the Pope seems clearly to be saying that he does not accept this interpretation of events.
Why is it necessary to construct such a “shield”? Well, evidently, for two principal reasons: (1) to make attacks against Gänswein’s authority less effective; and (2) to ensure Gänswein’s future, even in the absence of the Pope he now serves.
In this sense, this decision has just a hint of being an “end of pontificate” decision. Not that Pope Benedict’s departure is imminent; that would clearly be an exaggeration. But that Pope Benedict has acted now, decisively, in 2012, before his departure becomes imminent, to place Gänswein in a position of relative safety, no matter who succeeds him.
There is another peculiarity about this decision.
In a Church in which the hierarchical order has been, and remains, of central theological significance, a simple priest or monsignor has a lower place than a bishop, or a cardinal (unless the cardinal is not a bishop). In matters of worship, of decision-making, of day-to-day tasks, a bishop has greater authority than a monsignor — even a monsignor who is the Pope’s secretary.
To resolve that lack of authority, it might seem to make sense to raise the monsignor secretary to a higher dignity, that of bishop secretary.
But something in that epithet offends Catholic sensibilities.
The peculiarity of this situation is that a secretary to a bishop – in this case, as in the case of Dziwisz under John Paul II, the secretary to the Bishop of Rome, the papal secretary — ought not, usually, himself be a bishop.
Why?
Because the episcopal dignity in the Church has traditionally been seen as a sort of “ultimate” dignity: the fullness of Holy Orders. A bishop can be acolleague to another bishop, a brother bishop, but, normally speaking, not subservient to another bishop… not the personal secretary of another bishop.
That is why, normally, when a bishop’s personal secretary (usually a priest or monsignor) is promoted and himself consecrated as a bishop, he normally leaves the post of personal secretary and takes on another post, either as the head of a diocese, or as the titular head of a diocese with an administrative position.
That did not happen in this case. Gänswein will be raised the dignity of the episcopate, but he will remain the Pope’s secretary.
However, it can be argued (I suppose), that if anyone in the Church ought to have a bishop as his secretary, it is the Bishop of Rome — the Pope.
The present situation seems to be one of transition: the Pope has decided that he does in fact wish to promote Gänswein now to the episcopacy (in order to reward him, and also in order to protect him) while at the same time he wishes to keep him by his side for some time yet, so he has decided to give him a truly episcopal post — Prefect of the Pontifical Househald — while at the same time keeping him very close to him as his personal secretary.
In this, the esteem of the Pope for Gänswein, and his concern for the man who has been at his side for more than 15 years, could not be clearer.
==============
Biography
Gänswein was born in Waldshut, in the Black Forest, on July 30, 1956, making him 56 year old. He is the eldest of five siblings (two brothers and two sisters).
He was ordained a priest of the diocese of Freiburg im Breisgau on May 31, 1984. He graduated with a degree in Canon Law in 1993 from the Faculty of Theology at the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in Munich. After working as a judge in the Diocesan Court, in 1995 he came to Rome to work in the Congregation for Divine Worship. (In those years, I would occasionally encounter him as he walked back and forth from the Vatican on the via delle Mura Aurelie, where we have our editorial offices and where he had his residence in the German Mater Dei building.)
He was transferred to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1996, first working as an official in the Congregation, then, in 2003, becoming personal secretary to the then-Prefect Joseph Ratzinger, replacing Monsignor (now Bishop) Josef Clemens, who had been Ratzinger’s secretary since the early 1980s.

Gänswein is passionate about sport, an excellent skier and a strong tennis player.

Recently, when presented with an award in the Vatican, Gänswein explained his own understanding of role this way:
“Personally, I see my role and service to the Pope as a pane of glass,”Gänswein said. ”A pane of glass is a pane of glass when it is clean. The cleaner it is, the more it fulfills its purpose. If it gets dirty or breaks, it is still a pane of glass, but it does not fulfil its purpose.
“I need to let the sunlight in, and the less the pane of glass is visible the better; if it cannot be seen at all it means it is fulfilling its task,” Gänswein added. “The less I am deliberately on show the better.”
When asked about tensions in the life of the Roman Curia, Gänswein said: “Hostilities do exist, and if they affect the Holy Father, then they sometimes affect his secretary too. Suffering is part of the Via Crucis, but we do not choose it.”
Gänswein will be given the titular see of Urbisaglia (a city which once existed in the Marches in central Italy) and will be consecrated an archbishop on January 6 by Pope Benedict XVI himself, in a celebration that may also include Monsignor Fortunatus Nwachukwu, Chief of Protocol of the Secretary of State and recently named the new Apostolic Nuncio to Nicaragua.
During the recent “courtesy visits” to greet the new cardinals named by Pope Benedict on November 24, Gänswein and Nwachukwu walked together to greet the newly-created Cardinal Harvey (photo above), predecessor of Gänswein as Prefect of the Pontifical Household, now Archpriest of the Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls.
The appointment in August of Father Leonardo Sapienza (shown below with Pope Benedict) to be Regent of the Pontifical Household — a type of “Number 2″ after the Prefect — means that Sapienza has experience in the day-to-day activities of the Household, and it is expected that he will carry out many of the day-to-day operations beneath the new Prefect, Gänswein. Sapienza has not been promoted to become a bishop. (It is Sapienza, now under the direction of Gänswein, who will decide who will be able to be near the Pope, or greeted by the Pope, at papal audiences.)
In addition to his native German, Gänswein speaks excellent Italian, French, English, Spanish and is an accomplished Latinist.
===========================
Pilgrimages
If you would like to go with us at Inside the Vatican on a pilgrimage to Italy, please click on the link below to contact us.
=======================================
Note: A talk about the old Mass
Dr. Robert Moynihan recorded the following CD in 2007. Since then, more than 10,000 have been ordered. Dr. Moynihan gives a 2,000-year history of the Mass in 60 minutes, which is clear and easy to understand. Dr. Moynihan’s explanation covers many questions, like:
  • How does the motu proprio overcome some of the confusion since Vatican II?
  • Is this the start of the Benedictine Reform?
  • The mind of Pope Benedict: How can the Church strengthen the sense of God’s presence in the Liturgy?
To order, click on the CD below….
Our 2013 Pilgrimages all have openings, although some are filling up with past pilgrims.  For the 2013 schedule click here. 

Letter #34: Benedict’s Staggering Catechesis

December 6, 2012, Thursday — The Mystical Center of the Pope’s Thought

Yesterday we noted that the Vatican text of Pope Benedict’s remarks at his Wednesday General Audience omitted a few words the Pope had inserted into his prepared text “off the cuff.” But that was not really important — it was just a footnote, really, to the real story: Benedict’s crystal-clear, yet staggeringly profound, mystical teaching on God’s love

==============

The heart of the teaching

Where do we find the “heart” of Pope Benedict’s teaching?

In his Wednesday General Audience catechesis yesterday, Benedict gave us an astonishing glimpse into that heart, into the mystical heart of his understanding of all reality.

The mystical heart of Benedict’s teaching is… Christ.

Benedict’s understanding of reality is Christo-centric. Centered on Christ. Christ is at the heart of it.

And yet… having said that… there is still more to say.

And the Pope says it.

Essentially, Benedict says that there is not just Christ in the story of our world, our universe… not just Christ, but many other beings, and things, and especially, persons, ourselves… who really do exist, who have really been called into “being”… into existing… and who are all part of a drama, a story, which draws each of us toward the heart and fullness of reality: Christ.

And so Christ is at the heart, and there is also the journey toward Christ, which Benedict wishes all of us to begin.

And the fact that this journey can actually occur, that man can move toward Christ, draw near to Christ, leads the Pope to begin with a “prayer of blessing”… a “hymn of praise”…

In essence, Benedict is saying: “Praise God, for He has made a beautiful plan for our lives, for our existence,” a plan we can view with “wonder and gratitude.”

So Benedict begins this way:

At the beginning of his letter to the Christians of Ephesus (cf. 1, 3-14), the apostle Paul raises a prayer of blessing to God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ – a prayer that we have just heard – that introduces us to live the season of Advent, in the context of the faithThe theme of this hymn of praiseis God’s plan for man, defined in terms full of joywonder and gratitude, as a ‘benevolent plan’ (see 9), mercy and love.”

But because Benedict is reflecting on the letter to the Ephesians, and because St. Paul in Ephesians is thinking “cosmically” of the meaning of Christ’s death and resurrection within the total reality of the universe, the Pope’s reflection quickly turns to… the ultimate meaning of man’s existence. Do our lives have meaning?

These questions about meaning are important because meaning — searching for meaning (logos), finding meaning (logos), contemplating meaning (logos) — is the very essence of any conscious person, of any being with “personhood” — like us…

The Pope is persuaded that our lives do have meaning.

He is persuaded that the origin of all being, and especially of our being, the being of persons, the deep root of our lives, is in God who, from eternity, planned to bring all of us into being in time — some at the time of Abraham, some at the time of Christ, some at the time of St. Francis, some at the time of St. Maximilian Kolbe, some today, some tomorrow — so each life isintentional, each life is desired, God willed each one.

And because God is, as it were, meaning itself, pure meaning, pure significance (expressed most spectacularly and awesomely in His holiness, which is why we pray and chant the thrice-holy: “Sanctus, sanctus, sanctus,” “Holy, holy, holy, Lord God of the universe”), each of our lives has meaning.

St. Paul and the Pope are persuaded that this is the deep mystical truth of things — that through and in God’s meaning-filled will, we have meaning. That we are because we are meant to be, because we originate from meaning itself(or, more correctly, Himself).

So the Pope begins by asking:

“Why does the Apostle raise this blessing to God, from the depths of his heart? Because he looks at his work in the history of salvation, culminating in the incarnation, death and resurrection of Jesus, and he contemplates how the Heavenly Father has chosen us even before the creation of the world, to be his sons in his only-begotten Son, Jesus Christ (cf. Rom 8:14 s.; Gal 4:4 f.). Therefore we exist from eternity in God, in a major project that God has kept within himself and decided to implement and to reveal in ‘the fullness of time’ (cf. Eph 1:10). St. Paul helps us to understand, then, how all creation and, in particular, man and woman, are not the result of chance, but a loving plan to respond to the eternal reason of God with the creative and redemptive power of his Word which creates the world.”

This phrase “not the result of chance” is common in Benedict’s writings.

One could almost say it is one of his “signature phrases” — that the universe, and human beings, are not the product of a blind “Big Bang” and then an almost interminable evolution (as modern evolutionary science teaches) but of “a loving plan.”

So this phrase is, implicitly, a criticism of modern evolutionary theory.

In this passage, the Pope teaches that creation, the origin of all things — all the stars, all the animals and human beings — is a “response to the eternal reason of God” by “the creative and redemptive power of his Word” which “creates the world.”

The Pope is saying that God created (and, it would seem, though this is not entirely clear, createsthe universe through Christ, his Word.

Benedict then goes deeper. What is the real meaning of our existence? Is it just to live out our lives here, eating and drinking and breathing? No…

This first statement reminds us that our vocation is not simply to exist in the world, being inserted in history, or even just being a creature of God, it is something greater: it is being chosen by God, even before the creation of the world, in the Son, Jesus Christ. In Him we exist, so to speak, already. God contemplates us in Christ, as adopted children.”

These are, in a certain way, daring words.

Benedict is here teaching that each human person is a “Chosen Person” (much as Catholic teaching holds that the Jewish people is the “Chosen People”). In other words, there is the finger of God, the will of God, behind and before the coming into being of every human being.

And he is saying that this occurs, from God’s perspective, from all eternity, that is, that it occurs “even before the creation of the world.”

This is theologically daring, because it contains a suggestion that we “exist” before we exist. This would be a logical contradiction (we cannot exist before we exist).

And this is why the Pope uses the phrase “so to speak.”

He is saying, really, that human words fail him, and us, in this situation — that it would be logically wrong to say “we exist already in Him” but the fact that we are chosen by God is so real and important that it could almost cause us to say that we exist (“so to speak”) even before the creation of the world, in Christ, as adopted brothers and sisters of Christ.

The stress here is on God’s will, His choice, not on our existence.

The Pope then uses a key word: “mystery.” And we should embrace this word, and not be afraid of it, or irritated by it. For a “mystery” is not something contrary to reason, but something which transcends reason as we now experience it. We can accept that it is something true, although we do not comprehend how it can be true, due to the present limitation of our reasoning faculty, not to some lack in the truth of the “mystery.”

Benedict writes:

“The ‘benevolent plan’ of God, which is qualified by the Apostle as a ‘loving plan’ (Eph 1:5), is called ‘the mystery’ of Divine will (v. 9), hidden and now revealed in the Person and work of Christ. The divine initiative precedes any human response: it is a free gift of His love that surrounds us and transforms us.”

What can we take from these lines? We can take from them that we are close here to the very mind of God, to contemplating the very will of God. It is a mind, a will, which had been “hidden” and which is “now revealed in the Person and work of Christ.” So we can grasp that, in Christ, if we look upon Christ, if we contemplate Christ, we have a certain glimpse into God’s mind and will, into His ultimate plan. Christ is revealing God’s hidden plan.

And we can take from these lines that this is all grace, that it isn’t anything human beings toil to build, or do experiments to discover, or gather a thousand geniuses to labor for 50 years with supercomputers to unveil — no, it is something freely given by God to the world, to the universe…

But what is this “it”?

“It” is the ultimate goal of God’s eternal plan.

Benedict writes:

“But what is the ultimate goal of this mysterious plan? What is the centre of God’s will? It is – Saint Paul tells us – to ‘bring all things back to Christ, the only head’ (v. 10). In this expression we find one of the central formulations of the New Testament that make us understand the plan of God, his plan of love for humanity, a formulation in the second century, St. Irenaeus of Lyons placed at the core of his Christology: ‘to restore’ all reality in Christ. Perhaps some of you remember the formula used by Pope St. Pius X for the consecration of the world to the Sacred Heart of Jesus: ‘Instaurare omnia in Christo,’ a formula that refers to this Pauline expression, and that was also the motto of this holy Pontiff. The Apostle, however, speaks more specifically of restoring the universe in Christ, and this means that in the great design of creation and history, Christ stands as the center of the entire journey of the world, the central pillar, that attracts the whole of reality to itself, to overcome dispersion and limitation and lead everything to the fullness desired by God (cf. Eph 1:23).”

The plan is quite simple: to save the universe.

To save the whole of reality.

These are staggering thoughts.

And we wonder why Christianity is “totalizing,” why it grips some men and women with a power that persuades them willingly to give up their entire lives to help, in whatever way they can, to bring about this salvation.

To be a Christian is to be a partner in a plan to save the universe.

And is this the end of the audacity of Benedict’s thought in this teaching?

No. There is more. For he is about to reveal how the universe will be saved — how it has already been saved, if we would but believe it…

The Pope is very clear here: it is not by the giving of certain laws, or by the communication of a “set of truths” that the universe is saved — but by the communication of the very life and self of the divine source of all, the Holy One, the Son of God…

Benedict writes:

“This ‘benevolent plan’ has not been kept, so to speak, in the silence of God in the height of his heaven, but He has made it known by engaging with man, to whom He has not only revealed something, but His very self. He has not simply communicated a set of truths, but He communicated Himself to us, to the point of becoming one of us, to being incarnate. The Second Vatican Council in its Dogmatic Constitution Dei Verbum affirms: ‘In His goodness and wisdom, God chose to reveal Himself (here the Pope added: non solo qualcosa di se, se stesso, ‘not only something about himself, but himself’ [at 25:15 of the Vatican Radio recording]) — and to make known to us the hidden purpose of His will (see Eph. 1:9) by which through Christ, the Word made flesh, man might in the Holy Spirit have access to the Father and come to share in the divine nature’ (n. 2).

As if to emphasize the point and drive it home, Benedict repeats:

“God not only says something, He communicates with us, draws us into the divine nature, so that we are involved in the divine nature, deified.”

Deified.

This too is a daring choice of words.

Daring because it could be misconstrued by unwise, or unprepared, hearers as the assertion that human beings, you and I, will actually become divine, become God. (One danger from this teaching might be the temptation of grasping for this status out of pride and desire, when the entire point of the life and death of Christ was to show us that the “way up” is the “way down,” that only through humility can we begin to prepare ourselves to receive the gift, that the only communion that leads to our divinization is the communion of thevia crucis, the rejection of this world and of all the pride of this world.)

But there is no doubt that these words of Benedict’s can make us gasp with the grandeur of the vision they open up before us.

For in this vision, the “communion” we share with Christ, far from being a notional thing, a memory, a myth, a fairy-tale, is rather an ontological fact, that is, there is a true communication of life, of being, from Him to each one of us. At the risk of mispeaking, I venture to say that this is like a transfer of nature, a flow of essential energy, from him to us. And the essential nature of this energy is holiness. Sanctity. Sanctity is what is divinizing, and divine. And that, through Christ, is our destiny, in God’s loving plan. To become holy is to be saved, from sin, from death. To be holy is to live. (And this is why holiness is the source of healing miracles, and why some of the bodies of the saints are not corrupt.)

And then Benedict returns once again to his theme of “gift,” that this plan of God’s is a pure gift, gratuitous, not something we had to earn, or could have earned.

Benedict writes:

“God reveals His great plan of love engaging with man approaching him to the point of becoming himself is a man. The Council continues: ‘The invisible God out of the abundance of His love speaks to men as friends (see Ex. 33:11; John 15:14-15) and lives among them (see Bar. 3:38), so that He may invite and take them into fellowship with Himself’ (ibid.). By his intelligence and abilities alone man could not have reached this illuminating revelation – (here the Pope added: cosi luminosa ["so resplendent"] [24:03]) — of God’s love, it is God who has opened up His heaven and lowered himself to lead man into the abyss of his love.”

“To lead man into the abyss of his love” — perhaps these words are the most beautiful Benedict has ever spoken…

And then Benedict quickly cites several authors — St. Paul, St. John Chrysostom, St. Bonaventure, Blessed Pope John Paul II — who also speak beautifully about this mystical, “divinized” (holy) destiny of fallen man, saved in Christ…

Benedict writes:

“As St. Paul writes to the Christians of Corinth: ‘What eye has not seen, and ear has not heard, and what has not entered the human heart, what God has prepared for those who love him, this God has revealed to us through the Spirit. For the Spirit scrutinizes everything, even the depths of God’ (2:9-10).

“And St. John Chrysostom, in a famous comment on the beginning of the Letter to the Ephesians, invites us to enjoy all the beauty of this ‘benevolent plan’ of God revealed in Christ, and St. John Chrysostom says: ‘What are you lacking?You have become immortal, you have become free, you have become a child, you have become righteous, you are a brother, you have become a joint heir, to reign with Christ, with Christ you are glorified. Everything is given to us, and – as it is written – “how will he not also give us everything else along with him?” (Rom 8:32). Your firstfruits (cf. 1 Cor 15,20.23) is adored by angels [...]: what do you miss?’ (PG 62.11).

“This communion in Christ through the Holy Spirit, offered by God to all men with the light of Revelation, is not something that overlaps ["sovrapporsi" is the original Italian word, and it really means "places itself overtop, covers over"]  our humanity, but it is the fulfilment of the deepest human longings, of the desire for infinity and fullness that dwells in the depths of the human being, and opens it up not to a temporary and limited happiness, but eternal. St. Bonaventure referring to God who reveals Himself and speaks to us through Scripture to lead us to Him, says this: ‘Sacred Scripture is [...] the book in which the words of eternal life are written so that not only we believe, but may also possess eternal life, in which we shall see, we shall love and all our wishes shall be realized’ (Breviloquium, Ext., Opera Omnia V, 201S.).

“And finally, Blessed Pope John Paul II recalled also that – and I quote – ‘Revelation has set within history a point of reference which cannot be ignored if the mystery of human life is to be known. Yet this knowledge refers back constantly to the mystery of God which the human mind cannot exhaust but can only receive and embrace in faith’ (Encyclical Fides et Ratio, 14).”

Benedict then turns to the question of faith — faith that this is all really true, faith that this is all really God’s plan.

And he says that our job, or task, is to “allow ourselves to be grasped by the truth that is God.”

Citing Vatican II, Benedict says that our duty is to submit our “intellect and will” to God, who has revealed this plan to save us, and believe it.

Then the Pope, speaking extemporaneously, added that this did not mean that we had to obey, that we were obliged to obey, as if there were a tyrant standing over us, God the hard task-master, but rather that we should “let go” and “surrender” to “the ocean of God’s goodness.”

So Benedict was truly at pains to make clear that God does not demand our assent with harshness, but proposes it with tenederness — with love.

This is the great theme that one can discern in this and other writings of Pope Benedict. That God is not a God of fear, but of love…

Benedict writes:

“In this perspective, what is then, the act of faith? It is man’s response to God’s Revelation, which is made known, which shows His loving plan for humanity, and is, to use an expression of St. Augustine, allowing ourselves be grasped by the truth that is God, a truth that is love.

“This is why St. Paul emphasizes that we owe God, who has revealed His mystery, ‘obedience of faith’ (Rom 16:26; see 1.5, 2 Cor 10: 5-6), the attitude with which man commits his whole self freely to God, offering the full submission of intellect and will to God who reveals, and freely assenting to the truth revealed by Him” (Dei Verbum, 5).

“Obedience is not an act of coercion, it is letting go, surrendering to the ocean of God’s goodness. [at 19:45 of the Radio Vatican recording]

And once one surrenders to this love, and “embraces” faith, then what?

Then everything, Benedict says.

The Pope then continued:

“All this leads to a fundamental change in the way we deal with the whole of reality, everything appears in a new light, it is therefore a true ‘conversion,’ faith is a ‘change of mentality’ because the God who has revealed Himself in Christ, and has made known His plan, seizes us, draws us to Himself, becomes the meaning that supports life, the rock on which it can find stability.

“In the Old Testament we find an intense expression on faith, which God entrusts the prophet Isaiah to communicate to the king of Judah, Ahaz. God says: ‘Unless your faith is firm you shall not be firm’ (Is 7.9 b). There is therefore a link between being and understanding that expresses how faith is a welcoming into our lives God’s vision of reality, letting God guide us through His Word and Sacraments to understand what we must do, the path we must take, how to live. At the same time, however, it is precisely understanding according to God, seeing with His eyes, that makes our lives more solid, which allows us to ‘stand,’ not to fall.”

Benedict’s teaching was complete, and he gave one more paragraph as a summary:

“Dear friends, Advent, the liturgical season that we have just begun and that prepares us for Christmas, places us before the luminous mystery of the coming of the Son of God, the great ‘Benevolent Plan’ with which he wants to draw us to Himself, to help us live in full communion of joy and peace with Him. Advent invites us once again, in the midst of many difficulties, to renew our awareness that God is present: He came into the world, becoming a man like us, to bring His plan of love to fullness. And God asks that we become a sign of his action in the world. Through our faith, our hope, our love, He wants to enter the world again and again. He wants again and again to shine His light in our night.”

===========================

Pilgrimages

If you would like to go with us at Inside the Vatican on a pilgrimage to Italy, please click on the link below to contact us.

=======================================

Note: A talk about the old Mass

Dr. Robert Moynihan recorded the following CD in 2007. Since then, more than 10,000 have been ordered. Dr. Moynihan gives a 2,000-year history of the Mass in 60 minutes, which is clear and easy to understand. Dr. Moynihan’s explanation covers many questions, like:

  • How does the motu proprio overcome some of the confusion since Vatican II?
  • Is this the start of the Benedictine Reform?
  • The mind of Pope Benedict: How can the Church strengthen the sense of God’s presence in the Liturgy?

To order, click on the CD below….

Our 2013 Pilgrimages all have openings, although some are filling up with past pilgrims. For the 2013 schedule click here. 

Letter #33: Missing Words

 

December 5, 2012, Wednesday — Missing Words

The officially published Vatican text of Pope Benedict’s remarks today at his General Audience does not contain several words that the Pope spoke “off the cuff”

==============

The missing words

“L’obbedienza non è un atto di costrizione, ma un abbandonarsi all’oceano della bontà di Dio.” (“Obedience is not an act of coercion, it is letting go, surrendering oneself to the ocean of the goodness of God.”) —Pope Benedict XVI, at his Wednesday General Audience in Rome today, December 5, 2012. These words were not in the prepared text of the Pope, but inserted by him as he spoke. The official text posted on the Vatican website does not contain these words.

===============

When the Pope departs from his script…

Reading reports today of the Pope’s teaching at his General Audience — which during these weeks is devoted to the Year of Faith and what Christian faith really means — I was startled when I came across this note on an Italian web site:

MERCOLEDÌ 5 DICEMBRE 2012

Attenzione: il testo della catechesi del Papa diffuso dalla Santa Sede non è completo. Mancano alcune parole pronunciate “a braccio”
Cari amici, il testo della catechesi del Santo Padre diffuso dal sito del Vaticano (e riportato sul blog del “Magistero”) omette alcune parole fondamentali di Benedetto XVI, quelle sull’obbedienza che non deve essere considerata come una “costrizione”.

Translated:

Wednesday, 5 December, 2012

Attention: the text of the catechesis of the Pope published by the Holy See is not complete. Missing are several words spoken “off the cuff”

Dear friends, the text of the catechesis of the Holy Father published by the Vatican’s web site (and also on the blog “Magistero”) omit some fundamental words of Benedict XVI, those on obedience which should not be seen as something “coerced”

Source: http://paparatzinger6blograffaella.blogspot.it/2012/12/attenzione-il-testo-della-catechesi-del.html

This Italian blogger went on to say that she had noticed the omission “immediately” because she had heard the Pope’s remarks herself live, and had decided to use precisely those words as the headline of her report on the catechesis — but then found that the words were not published in the official text.

This blogger also noted that Pope Benedict often adds brief phrases to his prepared texts to explain what he is saying even more clearly, and she argued that the Vatican should be more attentive to integrating these “unscripted” words into the official published texts.

This type of incident can create problems, she said, because many secular news agencies look precisely for the phrases that the Pope utters that are not scripted, and use those phrases in their stories.

She added: “It makes no sense to go on Twitter if one is slipping up on the ‘fundamentals,’ that is, on the words of the Holy Father.” (“Non ha senso andare su Twitter se si scivola sui ‘fondamentali’ e cioe’ sulla parola del Santo Padre.”)

The entire catechesis, in the original Italian, may be heard at this link: http://media01.radiovaticana.va/audiomp3/00347014.MP3

======================

The Text of the Catechesis

Here below is the text of the Pope’s catechesis from today. The words in bold-face were spoken by the Pope, but they were not included in the text as published on the Vatican web site:

A Vatican Radio translation of the Holy Father’s catechesis

Marking the first week of Advent and the beginning of the new liturgical year, Pope Benedict XVI dedicated his general audience catechesis to living the season as an act of faith in God’s benevolent plan for humanity.

Below a Vatican Radio translation of the Holy Father’s catechesis

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

At the beginning of his letter to the Christians of Ephesus (cf. 1, 3-14), the apostle Paul raises a prayer of blessing [the Vatican text here omits the word "to"] God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ – a prayer that we have just heard – that introduces us to live the season of Advent, in the context of the faith. The theme of this hymn of praise is God’s plan for man, defined in terms full of joy, wonder and gratitude, as a “benevolent plan” (see 9), mercy and love.

Why does the Apostle raise this blessing God, from the depths of his heart? Because he looks at his work in the history of salvation, culminating in the incarnation, death and resurrection of Jesus, and he contemplates how Heavenly Father has chosen us even before the creation of the world, to be his sons in his only-begotten Son, Jesus Christ (cf. Rom 8:14 s.; Gal 4:4 f.).

Therefore we exist from eternity in God, in a major project that God has kept within himself and decided to implement and to reveal in “the fullness of time” (cf. Eph 1:10). St. Paul helps us to understand, then, how all creation and, in particular, man and woman are not the result of chance, but a loving plan to respond to the eternal reason of God with the creative and redemptive power of his Word which creates the world.

This first statement reminds us that our vocation is not simply to exist in the world, being inserted in history, or even just being a creature of God, it is something greater: it is being chosen by God, even before the creation of the world, in the Son, Jesus Christ. In Him we exist, so to speak, already. God contemplates us in Christ, as adopted children.

The “benevolent plan” of God, which is qualified by the Apostle as a “loving plan” (Eph 1:5), is called “the mystery” of Divine will (v. 9), hidden and now revealed in the Person and work of Christ. The divine initiative precedes any human response: it is a free gift of His love that surrounds us and transforms us.

But what is the ultimate goal of this mysterious plan? What is the centre of God’s will? It is – Saint Paul tells us – to “bring all things back to Christ, the only head” (v. 10). In this expression we find one of the central formulations of the New Testament that make us understand the plan of God, his plan of love for humanity, a formulation in the second century, St. Irenaeus of Lyons placed at the core of his Christology : “to restore ” all reality in Christ. Perhaps some of you remember the formula used by Pope St. Pius X for the consecration of the world to the Sacred Heart of Jesus: “Instaurare omnia in Christo,” a formula that refers to this Pauline expression, and that was also the motto of this holy Pontiff . The Apostle, however, speaks more specifically of restoring the universe in Christ, and this means that in the great design of creation and history, Christ stands as the center of the entire journey of the world, the central pillar, that attracts the whole of reality to itself, to overcome dispersion and limitation and lead everything to the fullness desired by God (cf. Eph 1:23).

This “benevolent plan” has not been kept, so to speak, in the silence of God in the height of his heaven, but He has made it known by engaging with the man, to whom He has not only revealed something, but His very self. He has not simply communicated a set of truths, but He communicated Himself to us, to the point of becoming one of us, to being incarnate. The Second Vatican Council in its Dogmatic Constitution Dei Verbum affirms: “In His goodness and wisdom God chose to reveal Himself (here the Pope added: non solo qualcosa di se, se stesso, “not only something about himself, but himself” [at 25:15 of the Vatican Radio recording]) — and to make known to us the hidden purpose of His will (see Eph. 1:9) by which through Christ, the Word made flesh, man might in the Holy Spirit have access to the Father and come to share in the divine nature” (n. 2).

God not only says something, He communicates with us, draws us into the divine nature, so that we are involved in the divine nature, deified.

God reveals His great plan of love engaging with man approaching him to the point of becoming himself is a man. The Council continues: “The invisible God out of the abundance of His love speaks to men as friends (see Ex. 33:11; John 15:14-15) and lives among them (see Bar. 3:38), so that He may invite and take them into fellowship with Himself “(ibid.). By his intelligence and abilities alone man could not have reached this illuminating revelation — (here the Pope added: cosi luminosa ["so resplendent"] [24:03]) — of God’s love, it is God who has opened up His heaven and lowered himself to lead man into the abyss of his love.

As St. Paul writes to the Christians of Corinth: “What eye has not seen, and ear has not heard, and what has not entered the human heart, what God has prepared for those who love him,” this God has revealed to us through the Spirit. For the Spirit scrutinizes everything, even the depths of God”(2:9-10).

And St. John Chrysostom, in a famous comment on the beginning of the Letter to the Ephesians, invites us to enjoy all the beauty of this “benevolent plan” of God revealed in Christ, and St. John Chrysostom says: “What are you lacking? You have become immortal, you have become free, you have become a child, you have become righteous, you are a brother, you have become a joint heir, to reign with Christ, with Christ you are glorified. Everything is given to us, and – as it is written – ‘how will he not also give us everything else along with him?’ (Rom 8:32). Your firstfruits (cf. 1 Cor 15,20.23) is adored by angels [...]: what do you miss?” (PG 62.11).

This communion in Christ through the Holy Spirit, offered by God to all men with the light of Revelation, is not something that overlaps — sovvraporsi –with our humanity, but it is the fulfilment of the deepest human longings, of the desire for infinity and fullness that dwells in the depths of the human being, and opens it up not to a temporary and limited happiness, but eternal. St. Bonaventure — (here the Pope added “da Bagnoregio” “from Bagnoregio” [21:53]) — referring to God who reveals Himself and speaks to us through Scripture to lead us to Him, says this: “Sacred Scripture is [...] the book in which the words of eternal life are written so that not only we believe, but may also possess eternal life, in which we shall see, we shall love and all our wishes shall be realized” (Breviloquium, Ext., Opera Omnia V, 201S.).

And finally, Blessed Pope John Paul II recalled also that – and I quote – “Revelation has set within history a point of reference which cannot be ignored if the mystery of human life is to be known. Yet this knowledge refers back constantly to the mystery of God which the human mind cannot exhaust but can only receive and embrace in faith” (Encyclical Fides et Ratio, 14).

In this perspective, what is then, the act of faith? It is man’s response to God’s Revelation, which is made known, which shows His loving plan for humanity, and is, to use an expression of St. Augustine, allowing ourselves be grasped by the truth that is God, a truth that is love.

This is why St. Paul emphasizes that we owe God, who has revealed His mystery, “obedience of faith” (Rom 16:26; see 1.5, 2 Cor 10: 5-6), the attitude with which man commits his whole self freely to God, offering the full submission of intellect and will to God who reveals, and freely assenting to the truth revealed by Him” (Dei Verbum, 5).

Here the Pope then said, and this is the main passage omitted in the official text: Obedience is not an act of coercion, it is letting go, surrendering to the ocean of God’s goodness. (“L’obbedienza non è un atto di costrizione, ma un abbandonarsi all’oceano della bontà di Dio.”) [at 19:45 of the Radio Vatican recording]

The Pope then continued:

All this leads to a fundamental change in the way we deal with the whole of reality, everything appears in a new light, it is therefore a true “conversion,” faith is a “change of mentality” because the God who has revealed Himself in Christ, and has made known His plan, seizes us, draws us to Himself, becomes the meaning that supports life, the rock on which it can find stability.

In the Old Testament we find an intense expression on faith, which God entrusts the prophet Isaiah to communicate to the king of Judah, Ahaz. God says: “Unless your faith is firm you shall not be firm” (Is 7.9 b). There is therefore a link between being and understanding that expresses how faith is a welcoming into our lives God’s vision of reality, letting God guide us through His Word and Sacraments to understand what we must do, the path we must take, how to live. At the same time, however, it is precisely understanding according to God, seeing with His eyes that makes our lives more solid, which allows us to “stand”, not to fall.

Dear friends, Advent, the liturgical season that we have just begun and that prepares us for Christmas, places us before a the luminous mystery of the coming of the Son of God, the great “Benevolent Plan” with which he wants to draw us to Himself, to help us live in full communion of joy and peace with Him. Advent invites us once again, in the midst of many difficulties, to renew our awareness that God is present: He came into the world, becoming a man like us , to bring His plan of love to fullness. And God demands that we become a sign of his action in the world. Through our faith, our hope, our love, He wants to enter the world again and again. He wants — sempre di nuovo [16:59] — to shine His light in our night. Thank you.

===============

Here below is the entire original Italian text of the catechesis from the Vatican’s official website; the main phrase that the Pope spoke but which is not included in this official post are inserted in italic about 80% of the way through the text; this text is found at the link http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/audiences/2012/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20121205_it.html

BENEDETTO XVI

UDIENZA GENERALE

Aula Paolo VI
Mercoledì, 5 dicembre 2012

L’Anno della fede. Dio rivela il suo “disegno di benevolenza”

Cari fratelli e sorelle,

all’inizio della sua Lettera ai cristiani di Efeso (cfr 1, 3-14), l’apostolo Paolo eleva una preghiera di benedizione a Dio, Padre del Signore nostro Gesù Cristo, che ci introduce a vivere il tempo di Avvento, nel contesto dell’Anno della fede. Tema di questo inno di lode è il progetto di Dio nei confronti dell’uomo, definito con termini pieni di gioia, di stupore e di ringraziamento, come un “disegno di benevolenza” (v. 9), di misericordia e di amore.

Perché l’Apostolo eleva a Dio, dal profondo del suo cuore, questa benedizione? Perché guarda al suo agire nella storia della salvezza, culminato nell’incarnazione, morte e risurrezione di Gesù, e contempla come il Padre celeste ci abbia scelti prima ancora della creazione del mondo, per essere suoi figli adottivi, nel suo Figlio Unigenito, Gesù Cristo (cfr Rm 8,14s.; Gal 4,4s.). Noi esistiamo, fin dall’eternità nella mente di Dio, in un grande progetto che Dio ha custodito in se stesso e che ha deciso di attuare e di rivelare «nella pienezza dei tempi» (cfr Ef 1,10). San Paolo ci fa comprendere, quindi, come tutta la creazione e, in particolare, l’uomo e la donna non siano frutto del caso, ma rispondano ad un disegno di benevolenza della ragione eterna di Dio che con la potenza creatrice e redentrice della sua Parola dà origine al mondo. Questa prima affermazione ci ricorda che la nostra vocazione non è semplicemente esistere nel mondo, essere inseriti in una storia, e neppure soltanto essere creature di Dio; è qualcosa di più grande: è l’essere scelti da Dio, ancora prima della creazione del mondo, nel Figlio, Gesù Cristo. In Lui, quindi, noi esistiamo, per così dire, già da sempre. Dio ci contempla in Cristo, come figli adottivi. Il “disegno di benevolenza” di Dio, che viene qualificato dall’Apostolo anche come “disegno di amore” (Ef 1,5), è definito “il mistero” della volontà divina (v. 9), nascosto e ora manifestato nella Persona e nell’opera di Cristo. L’iniziativa divina precede ogni risposta umana: è un dono gratuito del suo amore che ci avvolge e ci trasforma.

Ma qual è lo scopo ultimo di questo disegno misterioso? Qual è il centro della volontà di Dio? E’ quello – ci dice san Paolo – di «ricondurre a Cristo, unico capo, tutte le cose» (v. 10). In questa espressione troviamo una delle formulazioni centrali del Nuovo Testamento che ci fanno comprendere il disegno di Dio, il suo progetto di amore verso l’intera umanità, una formulazione che, nel secondo secolo, sant’Ireneo di Lione mise come nucleo della sua cristologia: “ricapitolare” tutta la realtà in Cristo. Forse qualcuno di voi ricorda la formula usata dal Papa san Pio X per la consacrazione del mondo al Sacro Cuore di Gesù: “Instaurare omnia in Christo”, formula che si richiama a questa espressione paolina e che era anche il motto di quel santo Pontefice. L’Apostolo, però, parla più precisamente di ricapitolazione dell’universo in Cristo, e ciò significa che nel grande disegno della creazione e della storia, Cristo si leva come centro dell’intero cammino del mondo, asse portante di tutto, che attira a Sé l’intera realtà, per superare la dispersione e il limite e condurre tutto alla pienezza voluta da Dio (cfr Ef 1,23).

Questo “disegno di benevolenza” non è rimasto, per così dire, nel silenzio di Dio, nell’altezza del suo Cielo, ma Egli lo ha fatto conoscere entrando in relazione con l’uomo, al quale non ha rivelato solo qualcosa, ma Se stesso. Egli non ha comunicato semplicemente un insieme di verità, ma si è auto-comunicato a noi, fino ad essere uno di noi, ad incarnarsi. Il Concilio Ecumenico Vaticano II nella Costituzione dogmatica Dei Verbum dice: «Piacque a Dio nella sua bontà e sapienza rivelare se stesso [non solo qualcosa di sé, ma se stesso] e far conoscere il mistero della sua volontà, mediante il quale gli uomini, per mezzo di Cristo, Verbo fatto carne, nello Spirito Santo hanno accesso al Padre e sono così resi partecipi della divina natura» (n. 2). Dio non solo dice qualcosa, ma Si comunica, ci attira nella divina natura così che noi siamo coinvolti in essa, divinizzati. Dio rivela il suo grande disegno di amore entrando in relazione con l’uomo, avvicinandosi a lui fino al punto di farsi Egli stesso uomo. Il Concilio continua: «Il Dio invisibile nel suo grande amore parla agli uomini come ad amici (cfr Es 33,11; Gv 15,14-15) e vive tra essi (cfr Bar 3,38) per invitarli e ammetterli alla comunione con Sé» (ibidem). Con la sola intelligenza e le sue capacità l’uomo non avrebbe potuto raggiungere questa rivelazione così luminosa dell’amore di Dio; è Dio che ha aperto il suo Cielo e si è abbassato per guidare l’uomo nell’abisso del suo amore.

Ancora san Paolo scrive ai cristiani di Corinto: «Quelle cose che occhio non vide, né orecchio udì, né mai entrarono in cuore di uomo, Dio le ha preparate per coloro che lo amano. E a noi Dio le ha rivelate per mezzo dello Spirito; lo Spirito infatti conosce bene ogni cosa, anche le profondità di Dio» (2,9-10). E san Giovanni Crisostomo, in una celebre pagina a commento dell’inizio della Lettera agli Efesini, invita a gustare tutta la bellezza di questo “disegno di benevolenza” di Dio rivelato in Cristo, con queste parole: «Che cosa ti manca? Sei divenuto immortale, sei divenuto libero, sei divenuto figlio, sei divenuto giusto, sei divenuto fratello, sei divenuto coerede, con Cristo regni, con Cristo sei glorificato. Tutto ci è stato donato e – come sta scritto – “come non ci donerà ogni cosa insieme con lui?” (Rm 8,32). La tua primizia (cfr 1 Cor 15,20.23) è adorata dagli angeli […]: che cosa ti manca?» (PG 62,11).

Questa comunione in Cristo per opera dello Spirito Santo, offerta da Dio a tutti gli uomini con la luce della Rivelazione, non è qualcosa che viene a sovrapporsi alla nostra umanità, ma è il compimento delle aspirazioni più profonde, di quel desiderio dell’infinito e di pienezza che alberga nell’intimo dell’essere umano, e lo apre ad una felicità non momentanea e limitata, ma eterna. San Bonaventura da Bagnoregio, riferendosi a Dio che si rivela e ci parla attraverso le Scritture per condurci a Lui, afferma così: «La sacra Scrittura è […] il libro nel quale sono scritte parole di vita eterna perché, non solo crediamo, ma anche possediamo la vita eterna, in cui vedremo, ameremo e saranno realizzati tutti i nostri desideri» (Breviloquium, Prol.; Opera Omnia V, 201s.). Infine, il beato Papa Giovanni Paolo II ricordava che «la Rivelazione immette nella storia un punto di riferimento da cui l’uomo non può prescindere, se vuole arrivare a comprendere il mistero della sua esistenza; dall’altra parte, però, questa conoscenza rinvia costantemente al mistero di Dio, che la mente non può esaurire, ma solo accogliere nella fede» (Enc. Fides et ratio, 14).

In questa prospettiva, che cos’è dunque l’atto della fede? E’ la risposta dell’uomo alla Rivelazione di Dio, che si fa conoscere, che manifesta il suo disegno di benevolenza; è, per usare un’espressione agostiniana, lasciarsi afferrare dalla Verità che è Dio, una Verità che è Amore. Per questo san Paolo sottolinea come a Dio, che ha rivelato il suo mistero, si debba «l’obbedienza della fede» (Rm 16,26; cfr 1,5; 2 Cor 10, 5-6), l’atteggiamento con il quale «l’uomo liberamente si abbandona tutto a Lui, prestando la piena adesione dell’intelletto e della volontà a Dio che rivela e assentendo volontariamente alla Rivelazione che egli da» (Cost dogm. Dei Verbum, 5).

[Here the Pope said these words, which are not published as part of the official text: “L’obbedienza non è un atto di costrizione, ma un abbandonarsi all’oceano della bontà di Dio." ("Obedience is not an act of coercion, it is letting go, surrendering to the ocean of the goodness of God.")]

Tutto questo porta ad un cambiamento fondamentale del modo di rapportarsi con l’intera realtà; tutto appare in una nuova luce, si tratta quindi di una vera “conversione”, fede è un “cambiamento di mentalità”, perché il Dio che si è rivelato in Cristo e ha fatto conoscere il suo disegno di amore, ci afferra, ci attira a Sé, diventa il senso che sostiene la vita, la roccia su cui essa può trovare stabilità. Nell’Antico Testamento troviamo una densa espressione sulla fede, che Dio affida al profeta Isaia affinché la comunichi al re di Giuda, Acaz. Dio afferma: «Se non crederete – cioè se non vi manterrete fedeli a Dio – non resterete saldi» (Is 7,9b). Esiste quindi un legame tra lo stare e il comprendere, che esprime bene come la fede sia un accogliere nella vita la visione di Dio sulla realtà, lasciare che sia Dio a guidarci con la sua Parola e i Sacramenti nel capire che cosa dobbiamo fare, qual è il cammino che dobbiamo percorrere, come vivere. Nello stesso tempo, però, è proprio il comprendere secondo Dio, il vedere con i suoi occhi che rende salda la vita, che ci permette di “stare in piedi”, di non cadere.

Cari amici, l’Avvento, il tempo liturgico che abbiamo appena iniziato e che ci prepara al Santo Natale, ci pone di fronte al luminoso mistero della venuta del Figlio di Dio, al grande “disegno di benevolenza” con il quale Egli vuole attirarci a Sé, per farci vivere in piena comunione di gioia e di pace con Lui. L’Avvento ci invita ancora una volta, in mezzo a tante difficoltà, a rinnovare la certezza che Dio è presente: Egli è entrato nel mondo, facendosi uomo come noi, per portare a pienezza il suo piano di amore. E Dio chiede che anche noi diventiamo segno della sua azione nel mondo. Attraverso la nostra fede, la nostra speranza, la nostra carità, Egli vuole entrare nel mondo sempre di nuovo e vuol sempre di nuovo far risplendere la sua luce nella nostra notte.

===========================

Pilgrimages

If you would like to go with us at Inside the Vatican on a pilgrimage to Italy, please click on the link below to contact us.

=======================================

Note: A talk about the old Mass

Dr. Robert Moynihan recorded the following CD in 2007. Since then, more than 10,000 have been ordered. Dr. Moynihan gives a 2,000-year history of the Mass in 60 minutes, which is clear and easy to understand. Dr. Moynihan’s explanation covers many questions, like:

  • How does the motu proprio overcome some of the confusion since Vatican II?
  • Is this the start of the Benedictine Reform?
  • The mind of Pope Benedict: How can the Church strengthen the sense of God’s presence in the Liturgy?

To order, click on the CD below….

 

 

Our 2013 Pilgrimages all have openings, although some are filling up with past pilgrims.  For the 2013 schedule click here.